Figure 4
Figure 4. Analysis of IRE motifs bound by IRP1, IRP2, or both IRPs. (A) Bioinformatic prediction of IRE motifs in IRP1 and IRP2 target mRNAs, IRP1-specific target mRNAs and IRP2-specific target mRNAs. (B) Motif distribution of novel IREs (also see supplemental Table 3). Motif number and percentage (motif n. and motif %) are shown in the 3 IRP-target mRNAs lists. IREs without a mismatch or a 3′ bulge are depicted in blue, IREs with a mismatch are in red, and IREs with a 3′ bulge are shown in green. (C) Enrichment of IRE motifs in IRP-target mRNAs. After normalization for n19 multiple IRE options in each IRE type, observed and percentage expected frequencies of IRE motifs were calculated (χ2 test, 1 df) and statistically significantly overrepresented motifs are shown. Red font, cross sign “x” or bracket cross sign “(x)” indicate differences compared with the canonical motif 1 IRE sequence. The cross sign or bracket cross sign indicate mismatches.

Analysis of IRE motifs bound by IRP1, IRP2, or both IRPs. (A) Bioinformatic prediction of IRE motifs in IRP1 and IRP2 target mRNAs, IRP1-specific target mRNAs and IRP2-specific target mRNAs. (B) Motif distribution of novel IREs (also see supplemental Table 3). Motif number and percentage (motif n. and motif %) are shown in the 3 IRP-target mRNAs lists. IREs without a mismatch or a 3′ bulge are depicted in blue, IREs with a mismatch are in red, and IREs with a 3′ bulge are shown in green. (C) Enrichment of IRE motifs in IRP-target mRNAs. After normalization for n19 multiple IRE options in each IRE type, observed and percentage expected frequencies of IRE motifs were calculated (χ2 test, 1 df) and statistically significantly overrepresented motifs are shown. Red font, cross sign “x” or bracket cross sign “(x)” indicate differences compared with the canonical motif 1 IRE sequence. The cross sign or bracket cross sign indicate mismatches.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal