Figure 1
Figure 1. AEP partially facilitates cell invasion. (A) SD1 cells demonstrate increased invasion compared with REH and SupB15 (P < .0001; left panel) and invasion is significantly (P < .0001) inhibited by the AEP inhibitor AEPi (100μM; right panel). (B) AEP transcript knockdown (SD1AEPkd) results in a marked decrease in AEP expression (right panel) and activity (middle panel) and a decrease but not complete inhibition of invasion (P = .003; left panel). (C) Expression of AEP in REH (REHAEPwt) results in a marked increase in AEP expression (right panel) and activity (middle panel) but only a modest increase in invasion (P = .01; left panel). All assays were performed in triplicate and the data shown summarize results of 3 separate experiments. For invasion assays, error bars represent SEM. Activity assay results are shown as fluorescent intensity per well ± SEM. AEP precursor (56 kDa) and activity (36 kDa) are detected. Dashed lines denote spliced noncontiguous lines within gels.

AEP partially facilitates cell invasion. (A) SD1 cells demonstrate increased invasion compared with REH and SupB15 (P < .0001; left panel) and invasion is significantly (P < .0001) inhibited by the AEP inhibitor AEPi (100μM; right panel). (B) AEP transcript knockdown (SD1AEPkd) results in a marked decrease in AEP expression (right panel) and activity (middle panel) and a decrease but not complete inhibition of invasion (P = .003; left panel). (C) Expression of AEP in REH (REHAEPwt) results in a marked increase in AEP expression (right panel) and activity (middle panel) but only a modest increase in invasion (P = .01; left panel). All assays were performed in triplicate and the data shown summarize results of 3 separate experiments. For invasion assays, error bars represent SEM. Activity assay results are shown as fluorescent intensity per well ± SEM. AEP precursor (56 kDa) and activity (36 kDa) are detected. Dashed lines denote spliced noncontiguous lines within gels.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal