Figure 5
Figure 5. Relationship between uPAR levels and in vitro angiogenesis. (A) Different clones, displaying different levels and distribution of uPAR, evaluated by Western blotting analysis for uPAR and caveolin-1 expression in basal conditions (−VEGF) and after VEGF challenge (+VEGF). Numbers on the right indicate molecular weight. The pictures show the results of a typical experiment of 3 that gave similar results. (B) Matrigel invasion of different ECFC clones in control conditions and in VEGF-stimulated cells. The histograms refer to quantification, expressed as number of migrated cells, of 3 different experiments performed in triplicate with each clone. Results are shown as mean value ± SD. *P < .05, significantly different from control. (C) In vitro capillary morphogenesis of different ECFC clones displaying different uPAR levels. The numbers in the frame represent the percentage of uPAR-positive cells. Histograms on the right show quantification of capillary morphogenesis experiments (under control conditions an VEGF stimulation, respectively). Image acquisition and quantification were performed as reported in Figures 1 and 3. Results are representative of a typical experiment of 3 experiments performed in triplicate with each clone and are quantified by measuring the absolute percentage field occupancy of capillary projections. *P < .05, significantly different from control.

Relationship between uPAR levels and in vitro angiogenesis. (A) Different clones, displaying different levels and distribution of uPAR, evaluated by Western blotting analysis for uPAR and caveolin-1 expression in basal conditions (−VEGF) and after VEGF challenge (+VEGF). Numbers on the right indicate molecular weight. The pictures show the results of a typical experiment of 3 that gave similar results. (B) Matrigel invasion of different ECFC clones in control conditions and in VEGF-stimulated cells. The histograms refer to quantification, expressed as number of migrated cells, of 3 different experiments performed in triplicate with each clone. Results are shown as mean value ± SD. *P < .05, significantly different from control. (C) In vitro capillary morphogenesis of different ECFC clones displaying different uPAR levels. The numbers in the frame represent the percentage of uPAR-positive cells. Histograms on the right show quantification of capillary morphogenesis experiments (under control conditions an VEGF stimulation, respectively). Image acquisition and quantification were performed as reported in Figures 1 and 3. Results are representative of a typical experiment of 3 experiments performed in triplicate with each clone and are quantified by measuring the absolute percentage field occupancy of capillary projections. *P < .05, significantly different from control.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal