Figure 2
Figure 2. Various types of CD4 and CD8 TMs show a similar polarized tissue distribution. (A) Tissue distribution of CD4 and CD8 TMs of various originalities. Top: CD4 and CD8 TMs (gated as Thy1.2+CD4+ and Thy1.2+CD8+, respectively) generated in the Thy1.1 congenic mice 2 months after transfer of a mix of equal number (10 × 106) of B6 CD4 and CD8 TEs; middle: memory-phenotype (MP) CD4 TMs (gated as CD4+CD25−CD44hi, CD25 staining was included to gate off Tregs) and CD8 TMs (gated as CD8+TCRβ+CD44hi, TCRβ staining was included to gate off the CD8+ nonαβ T cells present in some tissues) spontaneously generated in 1-year-old B6 mice (similar results were observed for B6 mice aged from 3 months to 1 year); and bottom: OVA antigen-specific OT2 TMs (gated as CD4+CD25−TCRVβ5+CD44hi, CD25 staining was included to gate off Tregs) and OT1 TMs (gated as CD8+TCRVβ5+CD44hi) generated in OT2 or OT1 transgenic mice 2 months after infection with 1 × 108 TU DC-directed lentivirus expressing OVA antigen. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 4). (B) Tissue distribution of CD4 and CD8 TCMs and TEMs. Various tissues were harvested from 1-year-old B6 mice and analyzed for the presence of MP CD4 and CD8 TCMs and TEMs (gated as CD4+CD25−CD44hiCD62L+, CD4+CD25−CD44hiCD62L−, CD8+TCRβ+CD44hiCD62L+, or CD8+ TCRβ+CD44hiCD62L−, respectively) using flow cytometry. Histogram plots (top) and quantification of TMs (bottom) are shown. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 4). TCMs indicates central memory T cells; and TEMs, effector memory T cells. (C) Visualization of the CD4 TMs formed in abino B6 mice each receiving 1 × 106 MFG-labeled CD4 TEs that had been differentiated in vitro into TH0, TH1, TH2, or TH17 cells using BLI. Representative BLI images collected 2 months after adoptive transfer are shown (n = 4). Schematic showing the individual tissue localization in mice is provided for reference. (D) Functional analysis of MP CD4 TMs residing in PPs of 1-year-old B6 mice. PP cells (pool of 4 mice) were stimulated with PMA + Ionomycin in vitro for 6 hours and analyzed for the cytokine production of CD4 TMs (gated as CD4+CD44+) using flow cytometry. Contour plots representative of 3 independent experiments are shown.

Various types of CD4 and CD8 TMs show a similar polarized tissue distribution. (A) Tissue distribution of CD4 and CD8 TMs of various originalities. Top: CD4 and CD8 TMs (gated as Thy1.2+CD4+ and Thy1.2+CD8+, respectively) generated in the Thy1.1 congenic mice 2 months after transfer of a mix of equal number (10 × 106) of B6 CD4 and CD8 TEs; middle: memory-phenotype (MP) CD4 TMs (gated as CD4+CD25CD44hi, CD25 staining was included to gate off Tregs) and CD8 TMs (gated as CD8+TCRβ+CD44hi, TCRβ staining was included to gate off the CD8+ nonαβ T cells present in some tissues) spontaneously generated in 1-year-old B6 mice (similar results were observed for B6 mice aged from 3 months to 1 year); and bottom: OVA antigen-specific OT2 TMs (gated as CD4+CD25TCRVβ5+CD44hi, CD25 staining was included to gate off Tregs) and OT1 TMs (gated as CD8+TCRVβ5+CD44hi) generated in OT2 or OT1 transgenic mice 2 months after infection with 1 × 108 TU DC-directed lentivirus expressing OVA antigen. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 4). (B) Tissue distribution of CD4 and CD8 TCMs and TEMs. Various tissues were harvested from 1-year-old B6 mice and analyzed for the presence of MP CD4 and CD8 TCMs and TEMs (gated as CD4+CD25CD44hiCD62L+, CD4+CD25CD44hiCD62L, CD8+TCRβ+CD44hiCD62L+, or CD8+ TCRβ+CD44hiCD62L, respectively) using flow cytometry. Histogram plots (top) and quantification of TMs (bottom) are shown. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 4). TCMs indicates central memory T cells; and TEMs, effector memory T cells. (C) Visualization of the CD4 TMs formed in abino B6 mice each receiving 1 × 106 MFG-labeled CD4 TEs that had been differentiated in vitro into TH0, TH1, TH2, or TH17 cells using BLI. Representative BLI images collected 2 months after adoptive transfer are shown (n = 4). Schematic showing the individual tissue localization in mice is provided for reference. (D) Functional analysis of MP CD4 TMs residing in PPs of 1-year-old B6 mice. PP cells (pool of 4 mice) were stimulated with PMA + Ionomycin in vitro for 6 hours and analyzed for the cytokine production of CD4 TMs (gated as CD4+CD44+) using flow cytometry. Contour plots representative of 3 independent experiments are shown.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal