Figure 6
Figure 6. Analysis of MAPK and NK-κB activation and surface molecule expression (CD83, RAGE) in G-β2GPI-stimulated DCs. (A) p38 MAPK and ERK activation in DCs stimulated with G-β2GPI. iDCs (5 × 104 cells) stimulated for 30 minutes with G-β2GPI (10 μg/mL), glucose (5mM), LPS (0.2 μg/mL), or PMA (0.2 μg/mL) were analyzed by cell-based ELISA MAPK assay to monitor p38 and ERK activation. The number of cells in each well was counted and normalized using crystal violet solution, and the results are expressed as arbitrary units. G-β2GPI induced the activation of both the p38 MAPK and the ERK pathways (n = 6, P = .001). (B, C) Flow cytometric analysis of CD83 and RAGE expression in DCs stimulated with G-β2GPI after pretreatment with specific inhibitors for the MAPK family. The increase in CD83 and RAGE expression after G-β2GPI stimulation was significantly prevented by pretreatment of iDCs with the p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580, whereas the pretreatment of iDCs with the ERK inhibitor PD98059 prevented only the up-regulation of RAGE expression (n = 3, CD83: *P < .01 and †P < .05 comparing G-β2GPI vs G-β2GPI + SB; RAGE: *P < .001 and †P < .001 comparing G-β2GPI vs G-β2GPI + SB and ‡P < .001 comparing G-β2GPI vs G-β2GPI + PD). (D) NF-κB activation in G- and M-β2GPI–stimulated DCs. In G-β2GPI- and M-β2GPI–stimulated DCs, active p65 and p50 levels were significantly increased compared with unstimulated iDCs. Pretreatment of iDCs with saturating concentrations of the blocking anti-RAGE mAb prevented the up-regulation of active p65 in response to G-β2GPI, but not in response to M-β2GPI (n = 6, p65: *P ≤ .001, †P < .01, and ‡P < .001 comparing G-β2GPI vs M-β2GPI and §P = .001 comparing G-β2GPI vs α-RAGE + G-β2GPI; for p50: *P ≤ .001).

Analysis of MAPK and NK-κB activation and surface molecule expression (CD83, RAGE) in G-β2GPI-stimulated DCs. (A) p38 MAPK and ERK activation in DCs stimulated with G-β2GPI. iDCs (5 × 104 cells) stimulated for 30 minutes with G-β2GPI (10 μg/mL), glucose (5mM), LPS (0.2 μg/mL), or PMA (0.2 μg/mL) were analyzed by cell-based ELISA MAPK assay to monitor p38 and ERK activation. The number of cells in each well was counted and normalized using crystal violet solution, and the results are expressed as arbitrary units. G-β2GPI induced the activation of both the p38 MAPK and the ERK pathways (n = 6, P = .001). (B, C) Flow cytometric analysis of CD83 and RAGE expression in DCs stimulated with G-β2GPI after pretreatment with specific inhibitors for the MAPK family. The increase in CD83 and RAGE expression after G-β2GPI stimulation was significantly prevented by pretreatment of iDCs with the p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580, whereas the pretreatment of iDCs with the ERK inhibitor PD98059 prevented only the up-regulation of RAGE expression (n = 3, CD83: *P < .01 and P < .05 comparing G-β2GPI vs G-β2GPI + SB; RAGE: *P < .001 and P < .001 comparing G-β2GPI vs G-β2GPI + SB and P < .001 comparing G-β2GPI vs G-β2GPI + PD). (D) NF-κB activation in G- and M-β2GPI–stimulated DCs. In G-β2GPI- and M-β2GPI–stimulated DCs, active p65 and p50 levels were significantly increased compared with unstimulated iDCs. Pretreatment of iDCs with saturating concentrations of the blocking anti-RAGE mAb prevented the up-regulation of active p65 in response to G-β2GPI, but not in response to M-β2GPI (n = 6, p65: *P ≤ .001, P < .01, and P < .001 comparing G-β2GPI vs M-β2GPI and §P = .001 comparing G-β2GPI vs α-RAGE + G-β2GPI; for p50: *P ≤ .001).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal