Figure 2
Figure 2. Flow cytometric analysis of phenotypic DC maturation and RAGE expression on immature iDCs stimulated with G-β2GPI. (A) Flow cytometric analysis of phenotypic DC maturation. After 18 hours of incubation, G-β2GPI and M-β2GPI induced similar DC maturation, whereas G-β2GPI only induced statistically significant up-regulation of RAGE. For HLA-DR: *P < .01 and †P < .001; for CD83 and CD86: *P < .001, †P < .01, and ‡P < .01 comparing G-β2GPI vs α-RAGE + G-β2GPI; for CD80: *P < .05 and †P < .01; for CD40: *P < .001, †P < .05, and ‡P < .05 comparing G-β2GPI vs α-RAGE + G-β2GPI; for RAGE: *P < .001 and †P < .001 comparing G-β2GPI vs α-RAGE + G-β2GPI. (B) Flow cytometric analysis of RAGE expression on iDCs stimulated with G-β2GPI at different time points. G-β2GPI induced statistically significant up-regulation of RAGE expression that remained elevated until 72 hours. *P < .001 and †P < .05.

Flow cytometric analysis of phenotypic DC maturation and RAGE expression on immature iDCs stimulated with G-β2GPI. (A) Flow cytometric analysis of phenotypic DC maturation. After 18 hours of incubation, G-β2GPI and M-β2GPI induced similar DC maturation, whereas G-β2GPI only induced statistically significant up-regulation of RAGE. For HLA-DR: *P < .01 and P < .001; for CD83 and CD86: *P < .001, †P < .01, and P < .01 comparing G-β2GPI vs α-RAGE + G-β2GPI; for CD80: *P < .05 and P < .01; for CD40: *P < .001, P < .05, and P < .05 comparing G-β2GPI vs α-RAGE + G-β2GPI; for RAGE: *P < .001 and P < .001 comparing G-β2GPI vs α-RAGE + G-β2GPI. (B) Flow cytometric analysis of RAGE expression on iDCs stimulated with G-β2GPI at different time points. G-β2GPI induced statistically significant up-regulation of RAGE expression that remained elevated until 72 hours. *P < .001 and P < .05.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal