Figure 2
Figure 2. PFS of 85 patients. PFS according to (A) PET2 visual assessment (positive vs negative), (B) SUVmax reduction between PET0 and PET2 (> 66% vs ≤ 66%), and (C) PET2 analysis combining visual and quantitative assessment.

PFS of 85 patients. PFS according to (A) PET2 visual assessment (positive vs negative), (B) SUVmax reduction between PET0 and PET2 (> 66% vs ≤ 66%), and (C) PET2 analysis combining visual and quantitative assessment.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal