Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison between Lhx2 and Hoxb4. (A) Retroviral vectors. (B-C) Frequencies of KSL cells on day 15 (B) and between day 12 and day 20 (C). The data were shown as mean ± SD (n = 6). Asterisks indicate significant differences (P < .01 by t test). (D-E) The RT-PCR analysis of Lhx2 and Hoxb4 expression (D), and Hoxb4 target genes (E). (F) Verification of the separation of EGFP/EYFP fluorescence. (G) KSL frequency of Lhx2 (EYFP−/EGFP+)–, Hoxb4 (EYFP+/EGFP−)–transduced and cotransduced (EYFP+/EGFP+) cells. Cells within Lin− compartments were shown in bottom panels.

Comparison between Lhx2 and Hoxb4. (A) Retroviral vectors. (B-C) Frequencies of KSL cells on day 15 (B) and between day 12 and day 20 (C). The data were shown as mean ± SD (n = 6). Asterisks indicate significant differences (P < .01 by t test). (D-E) The RT-PCR analysis of Lhx2 and Hoxb4 expression (D), and Hoxb4 target genes (E). (F) Verification of the separation of EGFP/EYFP fluorescence. (G) KSL frequency of Lhx2 (EYFP/EGFP+)–, Hoxb4 (EYFP+/EGFP)–transduced and cotransduced (EYFP+/EGFP+) cells. Cells within Lin compartments were shown in bottom panels.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal