Figure 6
Figure 6. Effects of cholesterol loading in vitro on the activation of WT and SR-BI−/− platelets. WT or SR-BI−/− platelets were isolated by gel-filtration from pooled blood of WT chimeras and loaded with increasing amounts of cholesterol in vitro by incubation with cholesterol-chelated MβCD. Incubation with αCD was used as control. (A-C) After cholesterol loading platelets were stimulated with ADP, thrombin, or convulxin (CVX), and platelet integrin αΠbβ3 activation was determined by FACS analysis. (D) After cholesterol loading, platelets were stained with 50 μg/mL filipin to label unesterified cholesterol and analyzed by flow cytometry. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of measurements after 3 separate cholesterol loading, which were repeated twice. *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001, compared with the same platelets without cholesterol loading. #P < .05, ##P < .01, ###P < .001, compared with WT platelets with the same concentration of cholesterol loading.

Effects of cholesterol loading in vitro on the activation of WT and SR-BI−/− platelets. WT or SR-BI−/− platelets were isolated by gel-filtration from pooled blood of WT chimeras and loaded with increasing amounts of cholesterol in vitro by incubation with cholesterol-chelated MβCD. Incubation with αCD was used as control. (A-C) After cholesterol loading platelets were stimulated with ADP, thrombin, or convulxin (CVX), and platelet integrin αΠbβ3 activation was determined by FACS analysis. (D) After cholesterol loading, platelets were stained with 50 μg/mL filipin to label unesterified cholesterol and analyzed by flow cytometry. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of measurements after 3 separate cholesterol loading, which were repeated twice. *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001, compared with the same platelets without cholesterol loading. #P < .05, ##P < .01, ###P < .001, compared with WT platelets with the same concentration of cholesterol loading.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal