Figure 1
Figure 1. Ex vivo femural pQCT analyses of ADA+/+ and ADA−/− compared with Rag2γc+/+ and Rag2γc−/− mice. (A) Total area (mg/cm3). (B) Medullary canal area (mm2). (C) Cortical thickness (mm). (D) Canal area/total area ratio (AU). (E) Strength-strain index (mm3). (F) Schematic view representing cross-sectional bone sections in diaphysis of all 4 groups of mice analyzed. (G) Cortical density (mm/cm3). (H) Trabecular density (mm/cm3). Box and whiskers graphs. ***P < .001. **P < .001-.005. *P = .005-.05. ADA+/+ (n = 22), ADA−/− (n = 18), Rag2γc+/+ (n = 10), and Rag2γc−/− (n = 14).

Ex vivo femural pQCT analyses of ADA+/+ and ADA−/− compared with Rag2γc+/+ and Rag2γc−/− mice. (A) Total area (mg/cm3). (B) Medullary canal area (mm2). (C) Cortical thickness (mm). (D) Canal area/total area ratio (AU). (E) Strength-strain index (mm3). (F) Schematic view representing cross-sectional bone sections in diaphysis of all 4 groups of mice analyzed. (G) Cortical density (mm/cm3). (H) Trabecular density (mm/cm3). Box and whiskers graphs. ***P < .001. **P < .001-.005. *P = .005-.05. ADA+/+ (n = 22), ADA−/− (n = 18), Rag2γc+/+ (n = 10), and Rag2γc−/− (n = 14).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal