Figure 5
Figure 5. ECFCs function in vitro and in vivo after large-scale humanized expansion. (A-C) Representative transformed images of vascular network formation from 3 typical independent oligoclonal cultures and (D) 1 monoclonal ECFC culture compared with (E,F) 2 independent oligoclonal UCB-derived EPC networks under the same conditions on Matrigel. Nontransformed original phase-contrast microphotographs are documented in higher magnification (Figure S5). Images were captured with an Olympus Color View III camera on an Olympus IX51 microscope (original magnification 20×/0.4 NA objective) with the Olympus analySIS B acquisition software. (G) Serial image reconstruction of one representative complete vascular network created in a 0.4-cm2 well of a 16-well glass chamber slide is shown (Videos S2,3). For in vivo neovasculogenesis, ECFCs from 2 donors were mixed with MSCs in Matrigel before injecting 0.2 mL of the composite subcutaneously in 4 nude mice per group (n = 24; 4 mice per ECFC source analyzed at 3 time points; a macroscopic view is shown in Figure S6D,E). (H) Topography of the histology is symbolized and (J) shown as a low magnification overview of a vimentin-labeled vascularized plug part. (K) Vimentin reactivity in the border area showing murine tissue (left half) in the direct vicinity of the human cell-containing area of the Matrigel plug as indicated in panel J. (M) Antihuman CD31, (N) antihuman VWF, (O,P) antimouse glycophorin A reactivity detected with antibody mTer119 within (O) human and (P) mouse vessels and (Q) representative isotype control reactivity of mouse red blood cell containing vasculature inside the plug.

ECFCs function in vitro and in vivo after large-scale humanized expansion. (A-C) Representative transformed images of vascular network formation from 3 typical independent oligoclonal cultures and (D) 1 monoclonal ECFC culture compared with (E,F) 2 independent oligoclonal UCB-derived EPC networks under the same conditions on Matrigel. Nontransformed original phase-contrast microphotographs are documented in higher magnification (Figure S5). Images were captured with an Olympus Color View III camera on an Olympus IX51 microscope (original magnification 20×/0.4 NA objective) with the Olympus analySIS B acquisition software. (G) Serial image reconstruction of one representative complete vascular network created in a 0.4-cm2 well of a 16-well glass chamber slide is shown (Videos S2,3). For in vivo neovasculogenesis, ECFCs from 2 donors were mixed with MSCs in Matrigel before injecting 0.2 mL of the composite subcutaneously in 4 nude mice per group (n = 24; 4 mice per ECFC source analyzed at 3 time points; a macroscopic view is shown in Figure S6D,E). (H) Topography of the histology is symbolized and (J) shown as a low magnification overview of a vimentin-labeled vascularized plug part. (K) Vimentin reactivity in the border area showing murine tissue (left half) in the direct vicinity of the human cell-containing area of the Matrigel plug as indicated in panel J. (M) Antihuman CD31, (N) antihuman VWF, (O,P) antimouse glycophorin A reactivity detected with antibody mTer119 within (O) human and (P) mouse vessels and (Q) representative isotype control reactivity of mouse red blood cell containing vasculature inside the plug.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal