Figure 5
Figure 5. Adhesion of WT HSPCs on MSPCs and homing of WT BMMNCs to the BM cavity. (A) WT Lin−c-kit+ cells (2 × 105) were added into each well preloaded with 105 cells/well WT or Fancg−/− MSPCs in 24-well plates. Adherent cells were counted under the phase contract microscope. Data are shown as mean (± SE) from 6 individual experiments (*P < .001 for Fancg−/− vs WT cells). (B) CFU-Cs from the tibia of Fancg−/− recipients after lethally irradiation and 106 BMMNCs injection with or without MSPC injection. □ indicates the PBS injection; ▨, Fancg−/− MSPC injection; and ■, the WT MSPC injection. *P < .05 for comparison of Fancg−/− MSPCs versus PBS injection, **P < .01 for comparison of WT MSPCs versus Fancg−/− MSPCs and PBS injection. The data show the mean (± SD) of 1 representative experiment of 3 independent experiments with similar results.

Adhesion of WT HSPCs on MSPCs and homing of WT BMMNCs to the BM cavity. (A) WT Linc-kit+ cells (2 × 105) were added into each well preloaded with 105 cells/well WT or Fancg−/− MSPCs in 24-well plates. Adherent cells were counted under the phase contract microscope. Data are shown as mean (± SE) from 6 individual experiments (*P < .001 for Fancg−/− vs WT cells). (B) CFU-Cs from the tibia of Fancg−/− recipients after lethally irradiation and 106 BMMNCs injection with or without MSPC injection. □ indicates the PBS injection; ▨, Fancg−/− MSPC injection; and ■, the WT MSPC injection. *P < .05 for comparison of Fancg−/− MSPCs versus PBS injection, **P < .01 for comparison of WT MSPCs versus Fancg−/− MSPCs and PBS injection. The data show the mean (± SD) of 1 representative experiment of 3 independent experiments with similar results.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal