Figure 7
Assessment of ERK1/2 phosphorylation after eotaxin and LTB4 stimulation. Pirb−/− or wild-type (WT) eosinophils were stimulated with eotaxin-2 (10 ng/mL; A,C) or LTB4 (10 nM; B,D) at the indicated time points. Thereafter, the cells were lysed, analyzed by SDS-PAGE, transferred to a membrane, and blotted with antibodies to phospho-specific ERK1/2 (pERK1/2) or total ERK1/2 as loading control. Quantification of band intensity (C,D) of eotaxin and LTB4 stimulated eosinophils. Each time point was normalized to the baseline phosphorylation state of WT mice and presented as fold increase plus or minus SD. Data represent n = 3 experiments; *P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001 when comparing WT and Pirb−/− cells.

Assessment of ERK1/2 phosphorylation after eotaxin and LTB4 stimulation. Pirb−/− or wild-type (WT) eosinophils were stimulated with eotaxin-2 (10 ng/mL; A,C) or LTB4 (10 nM; B,D) at the indicated time points. Thereafter, the cells were lysed, analyzed by SDS-PAGE, transferred to a membrane, and blotted with antibodies to phospho-specific ERK1/2 (pERK1/2) or total ERK1/2 as loading control. Quantification of band intensity (C,D) of eotaxin and LTB4 stimulated eosinophils. Each time point was normalized to the baseline phosphorylation state of WT mice and presented as fold increase plus or minus SD. Data represent n = 3 experiments; *P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001 when comparing WT and Pirb−/− cells.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal