Figure 2
Figure 2. Flow cytometry analysis of Fas or FasL expression with FITC-conjugated antibodies was performed on T-cell subsets that had been gated according to the double expression of IFN-γ or IL-4 (PE-conjugated antibodies) and CD4 or CD8 (PerCP-conjugated antibodies). (A) Fas expression on all T-cell subsets of ITP patients was not different from that of controls at any study point. (B) Patients' pretreatment expression of FasL was significantly increased (P < .01) on Th1 and Th2 cells compared with both controls and responders to rituximab, but comparable with that of nonresponders. No significant differences in FasL expression were observed on Tc subsets.

Flow cytometry analysis of Fas or FasL expression with FITC-conjugated antibodies was performed on T-cell subsets that had been gated according to the double expression of IFN-γ or IL-4 (PE-conjugated antibodies) and CD4 or CD8 (PerCP-conjugated antibodies). (A) Fas expression on all T-cell subsets of ITP patients was not different from that of controls at any study point. (B) Patients' pretreatment expression of FasL was significantly increased (P < .01) on Th1 and Th2 cells compared with both controls and responders to rituximab, but comparable with that of nonresponders. No significant differences in FasL expression were observed on Tc subsets.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal