Figure 3
Figure 3. Activation of the IL-9 promoter was mediated by NF-κB and the IL-9 NF-κB motif ATGTCAGGGTTTTTCCGTGTTTG bond to NK-κB in the gel shift assay. (A) Schematic representation of the IL-9 luciferase reporter constructs P1, P2, P3, P4, and P5 (ΔNF-κB). (B) IL-9 luciferase reporter construct P1 (10 μg) and CMV-Renilla (1 μg) were transfected into JPX-9 and JPX-m cells. The Tax expression was induced by addition of CdCl2, and the promoter activities were assayed at different time points after CdCl2 addition. The promoter activities were normalized by the Renilla value. The results are representative of 3 independent experiments. (C) 10 μg of the IL-9 luciferase construct and 1 μg CMV-Renilla were transfected into Tax expressing Hut102, MT-1, MT-2, and Tax nonexpressing Jurkat, CEM cells by electroporation. Dual-luciferase assays were performed 48 hours later. Normalized results using Renilla values are representative of 3 independent experiments. Experimental variations are indicated by SE bars. (D) The IL-9 luciferase constructs were transfected into Jurkart and CEM T cells in the absence (pMT2T, empty vector) or in the presence of 10 μg of the Tax expression construct pMT2T-Tax by electroporation. Dual-luciferase assays were performed following the manufacturer's recommendations. The data are representative of 3 independent experiments. (E) Gel shift assay. Extracts obtained from 293T cells transfected with p65 and p50 expression constructs were used for the binding of cNF-κB AGTTTGAGGGGACTTTCCCAGGC and IL-9 NF-κB ATGTCAGGGTTTTTCCGTGTTTG (the underlined sequences are the NF-κB binding sites). The typical p50/p65 heterodimer and p50/p50 homodimer can be readily seen with cNF-κB, whereas IL-9 NF-κB forms a complex that comigrates with the p50/p50 homodimer of the cNF-κB, as shown by an arrow (lanes 2, 6). The binding of cNF-κB to p50/p65 and p50/p50 complexes can be competed off specifically by addition of a 50-fold molar excess of unlabeled IL-9 NF-κB probe (lane 3) but was not affected by addition of a 50-fold molar excess of unlabeled nonspecific SP1 probe (lane 4). Similarly, the binding of IL-9 NF-κB to the p50/p50 complex was specifically competed off by addition of a 50-fold molar excess of unlabeled cNF-κB probe (lane 7) and was not affected by addition of a 50-fold molar excess of unlabeled nonspecific SP1 probe (lane 8). Lanes 1 and 5 represent the negative controls. (F) Gel shift assay. Nuclear extracts from the HTLV-I–positive cell line Hut102 were used for the binding of cNF-κB and IL-9 NF-κB. The patterns of cNF-κB and IL-9 NF-κB binding are very similar to panel E. A vertical line has been inserted to indicate a reposition of gel lanes.

Activation of the IL-9 promoter was mediated by NF-κB and the IL-9 NF-κB motif ATGTCAGGGTTTTTCCGTGTTTG bond to NK-κB in the gel shift assay. (A) Schematic representation of the IL-9 luciferase reporter constructs P1, P2, P3, P4, and P5 (ΔNF-κB). (B) IL-9 luciferase reporter construct P1 (10 μg) and CMV-Renilla (1 μg) were transfected into JPX-9 and JPX-m cells. The Tax expression was induced by addition of CdCl2, and the promoter activities were assayed at different time points after CdCl2 addition. The promoter activities were normalized by the Renilla value. The results are representative of 3 independent experiments. (C) 10 μg of the IL-9 luciferase construct and 1 μg CMV-Renilla were transfected into Tax expressing Hut102, MT-1, MT-2, and Tax nonexpressing Jurkat, CEM cells by electroporation. Dual-luciferase assays were performed 48 hours later. Normalized results using Renilla values are representative of 3 independent experiments. Experimental variations are indicated by SE bars. (D) The IL-9 luciferase constructs were transfected into Jurkart and CEM T cells in the absence (pMT2T, empty vector) or in the presence of 10 μg of the Tax expression construct pMT2T-Tax by electroporation. Dual-luciferase assays were performed following the manufacturer's recommendations. The data are representative of 3 independent experiments. (E) Gel shift assay. Extracts obtained from 293T cells transfected with p65 and p50 expression constructs were used for the binding of cNF-κB AGTTTGAGGGGACTTTCCCAGGC and IL-9 NF-κB ATGTCAGGGTTTTTCCGTGTTTG (the underlined sequences are the NF-κB binding sites). The typical p50/p65 heterodimer and p50/p50 homodimer can be readily seen with cNF-κB, whereas IL-9 NF-κB forms a complex that comigrates with the p50/p50 homodimer of the cNF-κB, as shown by an arrow (lanes 2, 6). The binding of cNF-κB to p50/p65 and p50/p50 complexes can be competed off specifically by addition of a 50-fold molar excess of unlabeled IL-9 NF-κB probe (lane 3) but was not affected by addition of a 50-fold molar excess of unlabeled nonspecific SP1 probe (lane 4). Similarly, the binding of IL-9 NF-κB to the p50/p50 complex was specifically competed off by addition of a 50-fold molar excess of unlabeled cNF-κB probe (lane 7) and was not affected by addition of a 50-fold molar excess of unlabeled nonspecific SP1 probe (lane 8). Lanes 1 and 5 represent the negative controls. (F) Gel shift assay. Nuclear extracts from the HTLV-I–positive cell line Hut102 were used for the binding of cNF-κB and IL-9 NF-κB. The patterns of cNF-κB and IL-9 NF-κB binding are very similar to panel E. A vertical line has been inserted to indicate a reposition of gel lanes.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal