Figure 7.
Figure 7. Identification of the natural counterpart of CD11bhiIalo DCs in vivo. (A-B) Isolation of the natural counterpart of CD11bhiIalo DCs. (A) CD4+CD8+B220+ splenocyte cells from normal mice or from IL-10–KO mice were first depleted by negative selection by using MACS system, and CD4–CD8–B220– splenocytes were stained by Ia-FITC, CD11b-PE, and PE-Cy5 conjugated anti-CD11c mAbs. To sort CD11cloCD11bhiIalo cells, CD11clo cells were first gated and further sorted using CD11b and Ia marker by FACSDiva (wt-mice), and the percentage of CD11bhiIalo DCs among all CD4–CD8–B220–CD11c+ DCs was analyzed (wt-mice and IL-10–KO mice). (B) CD11bhiIalo cells sorted from wt-mice in vivo or induced by ESSCs in vitro were added into the CD4/mDC coculture system, respectively, to compare their inhibitory functions. After 3 days of culture, the relative cell number of viable CD4 T cells was assayed by FACS. *P < .001.

Identification of the natural counterpart of CD11bhiIalo DCs in vivo. (A-B) Isolation of the natural counterpart of CD11bhiIalo DCs. (A) CD4+CD8+B220+ splenocyte cells from normal mice or from IL-10–KO mice were first depleted by negative selection by using MACS system, and CD4CD8B220 splenocytes were stained by Ia-FITC, CD11b-PE, and PE-Cy5 conjugated anti-CD11c mAbs. To sort CD11cloCD11bhiIalo cells, CD11clo cells were first gated and further sorted using CD11b and Ia marker by FACSDiva (wt-mice), and the percentage of CD11bhiIalo DCs among all CD4CD8B220CD11c+ DCs was analyzed (wt-mice and IL-10–KO mice). (B) CD11bhiIalo cells sorted from wt-mice in vivo or induced by ESSCs in vitro were added into the CD4/mDC coculture system, respectively, to compare their inhibitory functions. After 3 days of culture, the relative cell number of viable CD4 T cells was assayed by FACS. *P < .001.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal