Figure 3.
Figure 3. Cross-blocking assay to define the spatial relationship between linear and cyclic peptide contact sites. Different concentrations of Rp1-L (♦), Rp5-L (▴), RpCD20-L (▪), and Rp15-C (○) were mixed with an appropriate dilution of purified rituximab (3 μg/mL). After 1-hour incubation at 4°C, the mixture was added to wells of a 96-well microtiter plate previously sensitized with peptide Rp1-L (A), Rp5-L (B), Rp15-C (C), and RpCD20-L (D). Rituximab binding to peptide was then detected with HRP-conjugated xeno-antibodies to human IgG (Fc portion). Binding of rituximab to peptide in the presence of homologous peptide (broken line) and of Qp1a peptide (×) were included as positive and negative controls, respectively. Results are expressed as percentage of binding compared with binding in the absence of inhibitor.

Cross-blocking assay to define the spatial relationship between linear and cyclic peptide contact sites. Different concentrations of Rp1-L (♦), Rp5-L (▴), RpCD20-L (▪), and Rp15-C (○) were mixed with an appropriate dilution of purified rituximab (3 μg/mL). After 1-hour incubation at 4°C, the mixture was added to wells of a 96-well microtiter plate previously sensitized with peptide Rp1-L (A), Rp5-L (B), Rp15-C (C), and RpCD20-L (D). Rituximab binding to peptide was then detected with HRP-conjugated xeno-antibodies to human IgG (Fc portion). Binding of rituximab to peptide in the presence of homologous peptide (broken line) and of Qp1a peptide (×) were included as positive and negative controls, respectively. Results are expressed as percentage of binding compared with binding in the absence of inhibitor.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal