Figure 5.
Figure 5. Expression of markers associated with CD4CD25+ Treg cells is similar irrespective of CD44act levels after activation. (A) After 24-hour activation in vitro, cells were stained and analyzed by flow cytometry. Gating for histograms was done on the basis of Fl-HA binding, as indicated in the top panel. The HA-negative gate (left) is established based on the limits of KM81 blocking of the HA-positive population. Marker expression for total resting CD4CD25+ cells (gray line) is also shown for comparison. (B) Relative Foxp3 mRNA levels as measured by real-time quantitative PCR analysis in CD44act+ and CD44act– fractions of CD4CD25+ cells activated for 24 hours and separated as in Figure 3. Foxp3 levels in unactivated CD4CD25+ and CD4CD25– T cells are shown for comparison. Data shown are the mean ± SD of 3 experiments. P = .003, comparing CD44act+ Treg cells to unactivated CD4CD25– cells; P = .007, comparing CD44act– Treg cells to unactivated CD4CD25– cells.

Expression of markers associated with CD4CD25+ Treg cells is similar irrespective of CD44act levels after activation. (A) After 24-hour activation in vitro, cells were stained and analyzed by flow cytometry. Gating for histograms was done on the basis of Fl-HA binding, as indicated in the top panel. The HA-negative gate (left) is established based on the limits of KM81 blocking of the HA-positive population. Marker expression for total resting CD4CD25+ cells (gray line) is also shown for comparison. (B) Relative Foxp3 mRNA levels as measured by real-time quantitative PCR analysis in CD44act+ and CD44act– fractions of CD4CD25+ cells activated for 24 hours and separated as in Figure 3. Foxp3 levels in unactivated CD4CD25+ and CD4CD25 T cells are shown for comparison. Data shown are the mean ± SD of 3 experiments. P = .003, comparing CD44act+ Treg cells to unactivated CD4CD25 cells; P = .007, comparing CD44act– Treg cells to unactivated CD4CD25 cells.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal