Figure 2.
Endogenous TFPI is required for aPL internalization. Internalization of MM1 cell surface TF (A) and FVIIa (B) after 15 minutes of live cell stimulation with fluorophore-labeled aPL HL5B (IgG or Fab’2 fragment). Scale bar = 5 µm. (C) Schematic representation of complement-dependent and independent pathways initiated by aPL. (D) Flow cytometry detection of TF expression on CD115+ spleen monocytes for myeloid cell-deleted TFPI Kunitz 1 domain (TFPIΔK1) mice and littermate wild-type (WT) controls under basal conditions and after 3 hours of stimulation with 100 ng/mL LPS. Note that basal and LPS-induced TF expression was not affected by TFPI mutation. (E) FXa surface localization detected by flow cytometry on CD115+ splenocytes of TFPIΔK1 and littermate WT mice. (F) Live cell imaging of aPL HL5B internalization in TFPIΔK1 monocytes after stimulation with aPL HL5B. (G) Expression of TFPI isoforms by blood monocytes isolated from WT mice detected by RT-PCR with isoform-specific primers; mean ± SD. n = 4. (H) Dose titration of aPL HL5B binding to dry milk-blocked plates coated with 2 µg/mL soluble TF1-218,88 FVIIa, TFPIα47, or FXa. (I) Effect of aPL HL5B (500 nM) on TFPIα (10 nM) inhibition of FX (100 nM) activation by 0.5 nM TF in 60% phosphatidylcholine/40 sphingomyelin56 with 1 nM FVIIa. (J) Effect of 100 µg/mL HL5B on TFPIα (50 nM) complex formation with 1 µM soluble TFGCN4,89 3 nM FVIIa, and 2 nM FXa measured by amidolytic assay with Spectrozyme FXa.

Endogenous TFPI is required for aPL internalization. Internalization of MM1 cell surface TF (A) and FVIIa (B) after 15 minutes of live cell stimulation with fluorophore-labeled aPL HL5B (IgG or Fab’2 fragment). Scale bar = 5 µm. (C) Schematic representation of complement-dependent and independent pathways initiated by aPL. (D) Flow cytometry detection of TF expression on CD115+ spleen monocytes for myeloid cell-deleted TFPI Kunitz 1 domain (TFPIΔK1) mice and littermate wild-type (WT) controls under basal conditions and after 3 hours of stimulation with 100 ng/mL LPS. Note that basal and LPS-induced TF expression was not affected by TFPI mutation. (E) FXa surface localization detected by flow cytometry on CD115+ splenocytes of TFPIΔK1 and littermate WT mice. (F) Live cell imaging of aPL HL5B internalization in TFPIΔK1 monocytes after stimulation with aPL HL5B. (G) Expression of TFPI isoforms by blood monocytes isolated from WT mice detected by RT-PCR with isoform-specific primers; mean ± SD. n = 4. (H) Dose titration of aPL HL5B binding to dry milk-blocked plates coated with 2 µg/mL soluble TF1-218,88  FVIIa, TFPIα47, or FXa. (I) Effect of aPL HL5B (500 nM) on TFPIα (10 nM) inhibition of FX (100 nM) activation by 0.5 nM TF in 60% phosphatidylcholine/40 sphingomyelin56  with 1 nM FVIIa. (J) Effect of 100 µg/mL HL5B on TFPIα (50 nM) complex formation with 1 µM soluble TFGCN4,89  3 nM FVIIa, and 2 nM FXa measured by amidolytic assay with Spectrozyme FXa.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal