Figure 1
Figure 1. Effect of Hls5 on erythroid differentiation. (A) Fetal liver progenitors were exposed to Hls5 or Hls5-myc retroviruses, then plated in methylcellulose in the presence of Epo (5 U/mL); CFU-E and BFU-E were determined after 2 and 7 days, respectively. CFU-M were determined separately after 7 days. Each result is the mean plus or minus SD (n = 3) and displayed as percentage of control cultures. (B) Immunoblot analysis of exogenous Hls5 in J-Hls5 / J-Hls5-myc clones, probed with antibodies against Hls5 and Erk2 (loading control). (C) J-Hls5-myc cells were exposed to Epo (5 U/mL), and 48 hours after induction Hls5 protein was visualized using anti-myc antibodies. For all confocal analysis slides were mounted in 50 mM Tris HCL pH 8.0, 50% glycerol, 2.5% 1,4-diazobicyclo-[2,2,2]-octane (DABCO; Fluka, Castle Hill, Australia) containing 0.00005% Hoescht 33258 (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA). Micrographs were acquired with a Bio-Rad MRC 1024 UV Laser scanning confocal microscope (Bio-Rad, Hemel-Hempstead, United Kingdom) using a Nikon (Tokyo, Japan) 40× Fluor, NA 1.15 water immersion objective. Images were prepared for publication using Confocal Assistant (v4.02, BioRad). (D) Cytocentrifuge preparations of J2E and J-Hls5 cells were Wright-stained and mounted in DePex Mounting Medium (Biolabs, Vic, Australia). Micrographs were acquired using an Olympus IX71 inverted microscope fitted with a 40×/0.6 NA objective, connected to an Olympus DP70 microscope digital camera (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Image-Pro Plus (v4.5, MediaCybernetics, Bethesda, MD) was used to process acquired images. (Bar represents 20 μm). (E) The clonogenicity of various J2E and J-Hls5 clones was determined by plating cells in soft agar. Each result is the mean plus or minus SD (n = 3). (F) Growth rate of various J2E and J-Hls5 clones was determined by MTT assays. Each result is the mean plus or minus SD (n = 3). (G) J2E (blue trace) and J-Hls5 (red trace) clones were released from a nocodazole-induced G2/M block, and at the times indicated cell cycle progression was assayed by propidium iodide staining and visualized by flow cytometry. (H) Hemoglobin production of J2E and J-Hls5 cells after Epo induction was determined by benzidine staining. Each result is the mean plus or minus SD (n = 3). (I) Quantitative RT-PCR was performed on J2E cells expressing vector-alone, Hls5, or Hls5-myc. Transcript levels are displayed relative to β-actin (loading control). Each result is the mean (± SD) of 3 independent assays performed in triplicate. (J) Immunoblot (IB) analysis of J2E (vector alone) and J-Hls5 clones during Epo-induced erythroid differentiation, probed with antibodies against globins, GATA-1, and v-raf (loading control). GATA-1 levels (relative to v-raf) were quantitated and represented as a percentage of the GATA-1 (vector-alone) value at 0h. (K) Wright-stained cytocentrifuge preparations of J-Hls5 clones during erythroid terminal differentiation. Bar represents 20μm. Images were acquired as in panel D.

Effect of Hls5 on erythroid differentiation. (A) Fetal liver progenitors were exposed to Hls5 or Hls5-myc retroviruses, then plated in methylcellulose in the presence of Epo (5 U/mL); CFU-E and BFU-E were determined after 2 and 7 days, respectively. CFU-M were determined separately after 7 days. Each result is the mean plus or minus SD (n = 3) and displayed as percentage of control cultures. (B) Immunoblot analysis of exogenous Hls5 in J-Hls5 / J-Hls5-myc clones, probed with antibodies against Hls5 and Erk2 (loading control). (C) J-Hls5-myc cells were exposed to Epo (5 U/mL), and 48 hours after induction Hls5 protein was visualized using anti-myc antibodies. For all confocal analysis slides were mounted in 50 mM Tris HCL pH 8.0, 50% glycerol, 2.5% 1,4-diazobicyclo-[2,2,2]-octane (DABCO; Fluka, Castle Hill, Australia) containing 0.00005% Hoescht 33258 (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA). Micrographs were acquired with a Bio-Rad MRC 1024 UV Laser scanning confocal microscope (Bio-Rad, Hemel-Hempstead, United Kingdom) using a Nikon (Tokyo, Japan) 40× Fluor, NA 1.15 water immersion objective. Images were prepared for publication using Confocal Assistant (v4.02, BioRad). (D) Cytocentrifuge preparations of J2E and J-Hls5 cells were Wright-stained and mounted in DePex Mounting Medium (Biolabs, Vic, Australia). Micrographs were acquired using an Olympus IX71 inverted microscope fitted with a 40×/0.6 NA objective, connected to an Olympus DP70 microscope digital camera (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Image-Pro Plus (v4.5, MediaCybernetics, Bethesda, MD) was used to process acquired images. (Bar represents 20 μm). (E) The clonogenicity of various J2E and J-Hls5 clones was determined by plating cells in soft agar. Each result is the mean plus or minus SD (n = 3). (F) Growth rate of various J2E and J-Hls5 clones was determined by MTT assays. Each result is the mean plus or minus SD (n = 3). (G) J2E (blue trace) and J-Hls5 (red trace) clones were released from a nocodazole-induced G2/M block, and at the times indicated cell cycle progression was assayed by propidium iodide staining and visualized by flow cytometry. (H) Hemoglobin production of J2E and J-Hls5 cells after Epo induction was determined by benzidine staining. Each result is the mean plus or minus SD (n = 3). (I) Quantitative RT-PCR was performed on J2E cells expressing vector-alone, Hls5, or Hls5-myc. Transcript levels are displayed relative to β-actin (loading control). Each result is the mean (± SD) of 3 independent assays performed in triplicate. (J) Immunoblot (IB) analysis of J2E (vector alone) and J-Hls5 clones during Epo-induced erythroid differentiation, probed with antibodies against globins, GATA-1, and v-raf (loading control). GATA-1 levels (relative to v-raf) were quantitated and represented as a percentage of the GATA-1 (vector-alone) value at 0h. (K) Wright-stained cytocentrifuge preparations of J-Hls5 clones during erythroid terminal differentiation. Bar represents 20μm. Images were acquired as in panel D.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal