Figure 1.
![Figure 1. Thirty patients judged to be HIT-positive were tested in the PEA and SRA. The PEA was positive in 27 and the SRA in 16. Fig 1B. The PEA was positive in 8 and the SRA in 3 among 61 HIT-negative patients. The two assays had similar specificity (87% [PEA] vs. 95% [SRA]; p=ns), however, the PEA had significantly higher diagnostic sensitivity than the SRA (90% [PEA] vs. 53% [SRA]; p<0.01). Solid lines connect SRA and PEA results of each sample.](https://ash.silverchair-cdn.com/ash/content_public/journal/blood/126/23/10.1182_blood.v126.23.764.764/3/764fig01.jpeg?Expires=1747450900&Signature=L7~1inKZedhkR8xzx40EmKTegcsZcaNxZni3smfIO602TJqeu~4GLyVq0vm-F5c1H6WYnmL9gSRNjQ3xUP1hP6XRhTNVxmSCgChF76BSbBRD1M5FrXjJ4PTDJWBI1Y2ks~pSESxnswjC1zfhqGmc9EKy3-Xfn0JQfPX1HLm45ncOaL4a6kKhrMVVT3dF7B6Am61HW9tKFQnzFPj8nPUl2hRBXn4eRPmZyFhxat2R0teiI-6vU6lT0EWtDw~q5s0drSrafbCb4KTdKst67XC-hebAK9GR07~Dn33nG6bhDoYpXtEeUvq~sSF92Kcm~MhhYdAd2fjbbAhAlfayVH3IYw__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA)
Thirty patients judged to be HIT-positive were tested in the PEA and SRA. The PEA was positive in 27 and the SRA in 16. Fig 1B. The PEA was positive in 8 and the SRA in 3 among 61 HIT-negative patients. The two assays had similar specificity (87% [PEA] vs. 95% [SRA]; p=ns), however, the PEA had significantly higher diagnostic sensitivity than the SRA (90% [PEA] vs. 53% [SRA]; p<0.01). Solid lines connect SRA and PEA results of each sample.
