Figure 1.
Figure 1. Association of mutation load with response to rituximab therapy among FL patients. (A) The distribution of mutation load (per megabase) among untreated FL patients, grouped into mutation-high (>15 mutations/Mb, dashed line; n = 19), mutation-mid (≥6.6 mutations/Mb and ≤15 mutations/Mb; n = 85) and mutation-low (<6.6 mutations/Mb, dotted line; n = 112). (B) Kaplan-Meier estimates of PFS, stratified by treatment arm, are shown for the total biomarker-evaluated population. (C) Survival curves for patients with low, mid, and high mutation loads, stratified according to treatment arm. HRs, 95% CIs, and P values were calculated by using a Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for age, FLIPI, sex, and response to induction therapy.

Association of mutation load with response to rituximab therapy among FL patients. (A) The distribution of mutation load (per megabase) among untreated FL patients, grouped into mutation-high (>15 mutations/Mb, dashed line; n = 19), mutation-mid (≥6.6 mutations/Mb and ≤15 mutations/Mb; n = 85) and mutation-low (<6.6 mutations/Mb, dotted line; n = 112). (B) Kaplan-Meier estimates of PFS, stratified by treatment arm, are shown for the total biomarker-evaluated population. (C) Survival curves for patients with low, mid, and high mutation loads, stratified according to treatment arm. HRs, 95% CIs, and P values were calculated by using a Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for age, FLIPI, sex, and response to induction therapy.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal