Figure 7
Figure 7. C/EBPβ excision does not inhibit the development of Evi1-induced leukemia in vivo. (A) Schema of the BMT model using Mx-Cre;C/EBPβfl/fl mice and C/EBPβfl/fl mice. (B) Genotyping PCR of BM cells from Mx-Cre;C/EBPβfl/fl mice and C/EBPβfl/fl mice 3 days after retrovirus infection. Excision of C/EBPβ occurred without pI-pC injection. (C) Time courses of the percentage of donor chimerism in PB. Mx-Cre;C/EBPβfl/fl (n = 19) and C/EBPβfl/fl (n = 10). (D) The genomic DNA of PB derived from the recipient mice were analyzed for recombination events at 5 months (top panel) and 7 months (bottom panel) after the BMT. The intensity of the shortest band for the deleted allele was higher at 7 months than at 5 months. (E) The GFP-positive BM cells derived from the leukemic mice were sorted and analyzed for recombination events by genotyping PCR. (F) Kaplan-Meier analysis for the mice that had received the Evi1-transduced BM cells of the Mx-Cre;C/EBPβfl/fl mice (n = 19), C/EBPβfl/fl mice (n = 10), and wild-type mice (n = 21). (G) Schema of the second BMT model. LAP*, LAP, or LIP were transduced into the Evi1-induced leukemic cells derived from C/EBPβ−/− cells by using retroviral infection. The double-positive cells (Evi1-GFP/C/EBPβ–Kusabira Orange) were sorted and then were transplanted into the recipient mice. (H) Left panels show flow cytometric data of C/EBPβ–deleted Evi1 (GFP) leukemia cells with forced expression of each C/EBPβ isoform (Kusabira Orange) or empty vector (Kusabira Orange). The double-positive cells were sorted and transplanted to recipient mice. Right panels show engraftment of the double-positive (Evi1+, LIP+, or mock+) transplanted cells but no engraftment of the LAP*- or LAP-expressing cells at 6 weeks after transplantation. (I) Survival curves of the second BMT recipient mice. LAP* (n = 3), LAP (n = 5), LIP (n = 5), and mock (n = 3). The triangles and circles on the curves are inserted to distinguish each curve but do not show the number of samples.

C/EBPβ excision does not inhibit the development of Evi1-induced leukemia in vivo. (A) Schema of the BMT model using Mx-Cre;C/EBPβfl/fl mice and C/EBPβfl/fl mice. (B) Genotyping PCR of BM cells from Mx-Cre;C/EBPβfl/fl mice and C/EBPβfl/fl mice 3 days after retrovirus infection. Excision of C/EBPβ occurred without pI-pC injection. (C) Time courses of the percentage of donor chimerism in PB. Mx-Cre;C/EBPβfl/fl (n = 19) and C/EBPβfl/fl (n = 10). (D) The genomic DNA of PB derived from the recipient mice were analyzed for recombination events at 5 months (top panel) and 7 months (bottom panel) after the BMT. The intensity of the shortest band for the deleted allele was higher at 7 months than at 5 months. (E) The GFP-positive BM cells derived from the leukemic mice were sorted and analyzed for recombination events by genotyping PCR. (F) Kaplan-Meier analysis for the mice that had received the Evi1-transduced BM cells of the Mx-Cre;C/EBPβfl/fl mice (n = 19), C/EBPβfl/fl mice (n = 10), and wild-type mice (n = 21). (G) Schema of the second BMT model. LAP*, LAP, or LIP were transduced into the Evi1-induced leukemic cells derived from C/EBPβ−/− cells by using retroviral infection. The double-positive cells (Evi1-GFP/C/EBPβ–Kusabira Orange) were sorted and then were transplanted into the recipient mice. (H) Left panels show flow cytometric data of C/EBPβ–deleted Evi1 (GFP) leukemia cells with forced expression of each C/EBPβ isoform (Kusabira Orange) or empty vector (Kusabira Orange). The double-positive cells were sorted and transplanted to recipient mice. Right panels show engraftment of the double-positive (Evi1+, LIP+, or mock+) transplanted cells but no engraftment of the LAP*- or LAP-expressing cells at 6 weeks after transplantation. (I) Survival curves of the second BMT recipient mice. LAP* (n = 3), LAP (n = 5), LIP (n = 5), and mock (n = 3). The triangles and circles on the curves are inserted to distinguish each curve but do not show the number of samples.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal