Figure 4.
Figure 4. PIP4Kα shRNA induces absence of large MKs. (A) Mouse fetal liver cultures were treated with retroviruses that drive expression of PIP4Kα-specific shRNA and selected in puromycin. Cell fractions enriched for MK progenitors were isolated on day 5 and cultured further under drug selection. MKs from the ensuing (second) wave were used to prepare protein lysates and immunoblotted with PIP4Kα antiserum to reveal substantial down-regulation of the target protein compared with controls (empty vector). Protein loading was verified by Coomassie blue staining (right; only part of the gel is shown). (B) Selectivity of PIP4Kα shRNA. The PIP4Kα antibody recognizes PIP4Kα better than PIP4Kβ. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) from wild-type or PIP4Kβ-nullizygous mice were treated with the same PIP4Kα shRNA. Both kinase isoforms are present in wild-type MEFs, whereas PIP4Kβ–/– MEFs only express PIP4Kα. The shRNA specifically depletes PIP4Kα without affecting the PIP4Kβ isoform. (C) Progenitor fractions were monitored for MK differentiation. PIP4Kα shRNA-treated cells failed to develop into the largest MKs, as judged by both phase-contrast light microscopy (top) and 2-parameter flow cytometry (bottom) for forward light scatter (x-axis; FSC) and surface CD41 (y-axis). (D-E) Similar studies were conducted with EYFPki MKs. Representative micrographs show typical membrane staining of MKs treated with control (empty) virus (D), whereas in PIP4Kα-depleted MKs (E), the cytoplasmic fluorescent signal is uniform and lacks definition corresponding to internal membranes. Scale bars, 15 μm.

PIP4Kα shRNA induces absence of large MKs. (A) Mouse fetal liver cultures were treated with retroviruses that drive expression of PIP4Kα-specific shRNA and selected in puromycin. Cell fractions enriched for MK progenitors were isolated on day 5 and cultured further under drug selection. MKs from the ensuing (second) wave were used to prepare protein lysates and immunoblotted with PIP4Kα antiserum to reveal substantial down-regulation of the target protein compared with controls (empty vector). Protein loading was verified by Coomassie blue staining (right; only part of the gel is shown). (B) Selectivity of PIP4Kα shRNA. The PIP4Kα antibody recognizes PIP4Kα better than PIP4Kβ. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) from wild-type or PIP4Kβ-nullizygous mice were treated with the same PIP4Kα shRNA. Both kinase isoforms are present in wild-type MEFs, whereas PIP4Kβ–/– MEFs only express PIP4Kα. The shRNA specifically depletes PIP4Kα without affecting the PIP4Kβ isoform. (C) Progenitor fractions were monitored for MK differentiation. PIP4Kα shRNA-treated cells failed to develop into the largest MKs, as judged by both phase-contrast light microscopy (top) and 2-parameter flow cytometry (bottom) for forward light scatter (x-axis; FSC) and surface CD41 (y-axis). (D-E) Similar studies were conducted with EYFPki MKs. Representative micrographs show typical membrane staining of MKs treated with control (empty) virus (D), whereas in PIP4Kα-depleted MKs (E), the cytoplasmic fluorescent signal is uniform and lacks definition corresponding to internal membranes. Scale bars, 15 μm.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal