Figure 6.
Figure 6. OS, DFS, and CIR in AML patients (60 years or younger) with normal karyotype. (A) Comparison of the probability of OS according to the NPM1 and FLT3-ITD mutational status in the 4 defined groups. Group A (NPM1-mut alone) had a significantly higher actuarial probability of OS than group B (double mutants; P = .003) and D (all wt; P = .02), and trend was seen versus group C (FLT3-ITD alone; P = .11). (B) Probability of DFS in the 4 groups. Group A had a significantly higher probability of disease-free survival than group B (P = .02), group C (P < .001), and group D (P = .006). (C) CIR in the 4 groups. Analysis was done using the Gray k-sample algorithm in patients with normal karyotype showing a significantly reduced CIR for group A (CIR at 40 months, 25%) compared with the other groups (P = .004). Highest relapse rates were seen in group B (57%) and group C (51%); the CIR was 32.7% in group D.

OS, DFS, and CIR in AML patients (60 years or younger) with normal karyotype. (A) Comparison of the probability of OS according to the NPM1 and FLT3-ITD mutational status in the 4 defined groups. Group A (NPM1-mut alone) had a significantly higher actuarial probability of OS than group B (double mutants; P = .003) and D (all wt; P = .02), and trend was seen versus group C (FLT3-ITD alone; P = .11). (B) Probability of DFS in the 4 groups. Group A had a significantly higher probability of disease-free survival than group B (P = .02), group C (P < .001), and group D (P = .006). (C) CIR in the 4 groups. Analysis was done using the Gray k-sample algorithm in patients with normal karyotype showing a significantly reduced CIR for group A (CIR at 40 months, 25%) compared with the other groups (P = .004). Highest relapse rates were seen in group B (57%) and group C (51%); the CIR was 32.7% in group D.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal