Figure 4.
Figure 4. Effect of DHG on the affinity of the factor IXa–factor VIIIa complex on phospholipid vesicles. The apparent affinity (Kd(app)) of the factor IXa–factor VIIIa interaction was determined using enzymatic activity to detect complex formation in the absence (•) and presence of 4 (○) or 6 (▪) nM DHG. The rate of factor X activation by factor IXa–factor VIIIa was determined by adding increasing concentrations of factor IXa (0 to 30 nM) into a reaction containing 0.15 nM factor VIIIa, 200 nM factor X, and 50 μM PC/PS vesicles. Mean values were plotted versus factor IXa concentration with error bars representing ± SD (n = 4 to 6). The Kd(app) was determined by fitting the data to a single site–binding model. The Kd(app) and Bmax values ± SE were 1.2 ± 0.1 nM and 21.9 ± 0.3 nM/min, 10.0 ± 0.3 nM and 24.4 ± 0.3 nM/min, and 16.9 ± 1.4 nM and 23.2 ± 0.9 nM/min in the presence of 0, 4, and 6 nM DHG, respectively.

Effect of DHG on the affinity of the factor IXa–factor VIIIa complex on phospholipid vesicles. The apparent affinity (Kd(app)) of the factor IXa–factor VIIIa interaction was determined using enzymatic activity to detect complex formation in the absence (•) and presence of 4 (○) or 6 (▪) nM DHG. The rate of factor X activation by factor IXa–factor VIIIa was determined by adding increasing concentrations of factor IXa (0 to 30 nM) into a reaction containing 0.15 nM factor VIIIa, 200 nM factor X, and 50 μM PC/PS vesicles. Mean values were plotted versus factor IXa concentration with error bars representing ± SD (n = 4 to 6). The Kd(app) was determined by fitting the data to a single site–binding model. The Kd(app) and Bmax values ± SE were 1.2 ± 0.1 nM and 21.9 ± 0.3 nM/min, 10.0 ± 0.3 nM and 24.4 ± 0.3 nM/min, and 16.9 ± 1.4 nM and 23.2 ± 0.9 nM/min in the presence of 0, 4, and 6 nM DHG, respectively.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal