Figure 3.
Figure 3. Functional analysis of short-term T-cell cultures. PBMCs were isolated and subjected to CSA and staining with HLA-peptide tetramer. ELISPOT analysis on freshly isolated PBMCs was unreliable due to the low frequency of responding cells (data not shown) and so T cells were cultured with peptide for 14 days prior to an ELISPOT assay. Staining with HLA-peptide tetramer was performed at the same time. (A) Patient 21. (Ai) CSA of PBMCs illustrating 0.03% CD8 specific to CGAg peptide MAGE-A1289-298. (Aii) MAGE-A1-289-298 tetramer stain of PBMCs also stained 0.03% of the CD8 T-cell pool. (Aiii) MAGE-A1-289-298 tetramer stain of T-cell line after 14 days of culture showed 0.09% of CD8 T cell-binding tetramer. (Aiv) IFN-γ ELISPOT analysis at day 14 T-cell line (TCL) revealed that 0.04% of T cells responded to MAGE-A1-289-298 peptide. Similar analysis for peripheral blood in patient 22 revealed 0.04% of CD8+ T cells specific to MAGE-A2-157-166 peptide(Bi) and 0.04% of CD8 staining with MAGE-A2-157-166 tetramer (Bii). At day 14, 0.26% of CD8 stained with tetramer (Biii) and 0.05% of T cells responded to MAGE-A2-157-166 peptide in ELISPOT assay (Biv). (C) Similar analysis for peripheral blood in patient 7 illustrated 0.02% of CD8+ T cells specific to MAGE-A1-289-298 (Ci) and 0.03% of CD8 staining with MAGE-A1-289-298 tetramer (Cii). At day 14, 0.05% of CD8 stained with tetramer (Ciii) and 0.04% of T cells responded to MAGE-A1-289-298 peptide in ELISPOT assay (Civ). (D) A tetramer for the peptide MAGE-A3-195-203 restricted to HLA-A*2401 was not available; however, analysis of peripheral blood from patient 23 revealed 0.05% of CD8+ T cells specific to MAGE-A3-195-203 peptide by IFN-γ CSA. At day 14, 0.05% of T cells responded to the peptide in ELISPOT assay (Dii). (Note: To maximize the number of events analyzed by FACS, PBMCs were gated on CD8 only when tetramer staining was performed on peripheral blood.)

Functional analysis of short-term T-cell cultures. PBMCs were isolated and subjected to CSA and staining with HLA-peptide tetramer. ELISPOT analysis on freshly isolated PBMCs was unreliable due to the low frequency of responding cells (data not shown) and so T cells were cultured with peptide for 14 days prior to an ELISPOT assay. Staining with HLA-peptide tetramer was performed at the same time. (A) Patient 21. (Ai) CSA of PBMCs illustrating 0.03% CD8 specific to CGAg peptide MAGE-A1289-298. (Aii) MAGE-A1-289-298 tetramer stain of PBMCs also stained 0.03% of the CD8 T-cell pool. (Aiii) MAGE-A1-289-298 tetramer stain of T-cell line after 14 days of culture showed 0.09% of CD8 T cell-binding tetramer. (Aiv) IFN-γ ELISPOT analysis at day 14 T-cell line (TCL) revealed that 0.04% of T cells responded to MAGE-A1-289-298 peptide. Similar analysis for peripheral blood in patient 22 revealed 0.04% of CD8+ T cells specific to MAGE-A2-157-166 peptide(Bi) and 0.04% of CD8 staining with MAGE-A2-157-166 tetramer (Bii). At day 14, 0.26% of CD8 stained with tetramer (Biii) and 0.05% of T cells responded to MAGE-A2-157-166 peptide in ELISPOT assay (Biv). (C) Similar analysis for peripheral blood in patient 7 illustrated 0.02% of CD8+ T cells specific to MAGE-A1-289-298 (Ci) and 0.03% of CD8 staining with MAGE-A1-289-298 tetramer (Cii). At day 14, 0.05% of CD8 stained with tetramer (Ciii) and 0.04% of T cells responded to MAGE-A1-289-298 peptide in ELISPOT assay (Civ). (D) A tetramer for the peptide MAGE-A3-195-203 restricted to HLA-A*2401 was not available; however, analysis of peripheral blood from patient 23 revealed 0.05% of CD8+ T cells specific to MAGE-A3-195-203 peptide by IFN-γ CSA. At day 14, 0.05% of T cells responded to the peptide in ELISPOT assay (Dii). (Note: To maximize the number of events analyzed by FACS, PBMCs were gated on CD8 only when tetramer staining was performed on peripheral blood.)

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal