Figure 1.
EORTC QLQ-C30 mean domain scores (standard deviation) of the European CAR-T patients compared with a matched cohort of European patients with high-grade NHL and the European general population.23,24 EORTC QLQ-C30 mean domain scores are presented as a bar chart for all subscales (A) and for the functioning subscales also as a spider plot (B) EORTC QLQ-C30 domain scores were measured with the EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3.0 questionnaire. Domain scores range from 0 to 100. For QL and functioning subscales, higher scores indicate better functioning, whereas higher scores in the symptom subscales indicate higher burden. aNot matched for age, sex, or country. bA threshold for clinically relevant difference in mean domain score for emotional functioning and the summary score was not available; therefore, we used one-third of the SD of the CAR-T cohort mean domain score for emotional functioning and summary score as thresholds.

EORTC QLQ-C30 mean domain scores (standard deviation) of the European CAR-T patients compared with a matched cohort of European patients with high-grade NHL and the European general population.23,24 EORTC QLQ-C30 mean domain scores are presented as a bar chart for all subscales (A) and for the functioning subscales also as a spider plot (B) EORTC QLQ-C30 domain scores were measured with the EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3.0 questionnaire. Domain scores range from 0 to 100. For QL and functioning subscales, higher scores indicate better functioning, whereas higher scores in the symptom subscales indicate higher burden. aNot matched for age, sex, or country. bA threshold for clinically relevant difference in mean domain score for emotional functioning and the summary score was not available; therefore, we used one-third of the SD of the CAR-T cohort mean domain score for emotional functioning and summary score as thresholds.

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal