Figure 1.
CIMP, MRD, WBC, and outcome in T-ALL in the study of NOPHO ALL2008 cohort. (A) Heat map of the 1091 CIMP panel CpGs in n = 192 NOPHO ALL2008 T-ALL samples at diagnosis, classified as CIMP low (n = 76) and CIMP high (n = 116) in CIMP% order. Healthy sorted CD34+ and CD3+ T cells and lymph node samples are revealed for comparison. (B) Distribution of the outcomes in 172 patients in relation to D29 MRD, WBC, and CIMP methylation %. MRD is log10 transformed, and WBC is zero scaled at 50 and log10 transformed. Yellow lines represent MRD 0.1%, WBC 50, and CIMP 40% cutoffs. (C) Alluvial plot depicting the timeline of patients from CIMP subgroups at diagnosis to the D15 MRD and D29 MRD until outcomes. In panels B and C, only the 172 patients with complete CIMP, WBC, and MRD data are illustrated. NS, not stratified due to IF.

CIMP, MRD, WBC, and outcome in T-ALL in the study of NOPHO ALL2008 cohort. (A) Heat map of the 1091 CIMP panel CpGs in n = 192 NOPHO ALL2008 T-ALL samples at diagnosis, classified as CIMP low (n = 76) and CIMP high (n = 116) in CIMP% order. Healthy sorted CD34+ and CD3+ T cells and lymph node samples are revealed for comparison. (B) Distribution of the outcomes in 172 patients in relation to D29 MRD, WBC, and CIMP methylation %. MRD is log10 transformed, and WBC is zero scaled at 50 and log10 transformed. Yellow lines represent MRD 0.1%, WBC 50, and CIMP 40% cutoffs. (C) Alluvial plot depicting the timeline of patients from CIMP subgroups at diagnosis to the D15 MRD and D29 MRD until outcomes. In panels B and C, only the 172 patients with complete CIMP, WBC, and MRD data are illustrated. NS, not stratified due to IF.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal