Figure 3.
Expression and release of TM from HUVEC. (A) TM was measured by ELISA in HUVEC and HUVEC536 CM and lysates (CM/lysate ratio reflects TM release capacity). (B) TM contained in the CM of HUVEC and HUVEC536 was concentrated by Con A or FIIa affinity purification and run on SDS-PAGE alongside sTM produced by HEK293 cells overexpressing TM536, then TM was detected by immunoblot. (C) Expression of TM on the surface of HUVEC and HUVEC536 was measured using flow cytometry. (D) Immunoblot detection of TM and GAPDH (loading control) in lysates of HUVEC and HUVEC536. (E) TM was detected in the lysates of HUVEC and HUVEC536 submitted (+) or not (−) to EndoH deglycosylation. Value are mean ± SD expressed as fold change relative to TMWT or HUVEC. Statistical analyses were performed using an unpaired t test for panel A or Mann-Whitney test for panel C. ∗P < .05; ∗∗∗P < .001. Con A, Concanavalin A; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; OE, overexposed blot.

Expression and release of TM from HUVEC. (A) TM was measured by ELISA in HUVEC and HUVEC536 CM and lysates (CM/lysate ratio reflects TM release capacity). (B) TM contained in the CM of HUVEC and HUVEC536 was concentrated by Con A or FIIa affinity purification and run on SDS-PAGE alongside sTM produced by HEK293 cells overexpressing TM536, then TM was detected by immunoblot. (C) Expression of TM on the surface of HUVEC and HUVEC536 was measured using flow cytometry. (D) Immunoblot detection of TM and GAPDH (loading control) in lysates of HUVEC and HUVEC536. (E) TM was detected in the lysates of HUVEC and HUVEC536 submitted (+) or not (−) to EndoH deglycosylation. Value are mean ± SD expressed as fold change relative to TMWT or HUVEC. Statistical analyses were performed using an unpaired t test for panel A or Mann-Whitney test for panel C. ∗P < .05; ∗∗∗P < .001. Con A, Concanavalin A; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; OE, overexposed blot.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal