Figure 1.
Relationship between DCS and ASL–MRI measures of blood flow. CBF (mL/min per 100 g) measured with ASL-MRI vs CBFi (1 × 10−7 cm2/s) measured with DCS (n = 8 patients). Strong correlation between the 2 measures was observed (R2 = 0.651; P = .015). The solid line denotes the best linear fit to the data, and the dotted lines indicate the 95% CI to this fit. The slope of the line of best fit was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.97-1.03), and the intercept was 60.6 (95% CI, 55.7-65.4). CI, confidence interval.

Relationship between DCS and ASL–MRI measures of blood flow. CBF (mL/min per 100 g) measured with ASL-MRI vs CBFi (1 × 10−7 cm2/s) measured with DCS (n = 8 patients). Strong correlation between the 2 measures was observed (R2 = 0.651; P = .015). The solid line denotes the best linear fit to the data, and the dotted lines indicate the 95% CI to this fit. The slope of the line of best fit was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.97-1.03), and the intercept was 60.6 (95% CI, 55.7-65.4). CI, confidence interval.

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal