Figure 3.
The combination of human chimerism in the PB, PLT count, and time after transplantation can predict human chimerism in the BM. (A) Human chimerism in the murine BM over time. A sigmoidal curve was fitted to the data points. (B) Human chimerism (human CD45+ cells of human and mouse CD45+ cells) in the murine BM at necropsy. A hyperbolic curve was fitted to the data points. (C) PLT count from the PB over time. The curve represents the mean values of each time point; n = 24. (D) Relationship between human chimerism in the PB and the PLT count at necropsy. Linear regression (r = –0.72, P < .0001). (E) Relationship between human chimerism in the BM and the PLT count at necropsy. A second order polynomial curve was fitted to the data points. The legend shows days after injection. The gray shades in panels C through E show the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the PLT counts of 37 control animals (mean, 1408.2 ± 406.3).

The combination of human chimerism in the PB, PLT count, and time after transplantation can predict human chimerism in the BM. (A) Human chimerism in the murine BM over time. A sigmoidal curve was fitted to the data points. (B) Human chimerism (human CD45+ cells of human and mouse CD45+ cells) in the murine BM at necropsy. A hyperbolic curve was fitted to the data points. (C) PLT count from the PB over time. The curve represents the mean values of each time point; n = 24. (D) Relationship between human chimerism in the PB and the PLT count at necropsy. Linear regression (r = –0.72, P < .0001). (E) Relationship between human chimerism in the BM and the PLT count at necropsy. A second order polynomial curve was fitted to the data points. The legend shows days after injection. The gray shades in panels C through E show the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the PLT counts of 37 control animals (mean, 1408.2 ± 406.3).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal