Figure 6.
Sequential therapy with tafasitamab and CART19 cell decreased the severity of CRS and increased the antitumor effect of CART19. (A) Experimental scheme. NSG mice were first treated with 30 mg/kg of busulfan via IP injection. After 24 hours, the mice were injected with 5 × 106 of leukemic blasts derived from patients with R/R ALL. The mice were then monitored for tumor burden via PB sampling. Once human CD45+ cells within mouse blood reached >10 cells per μL, the mice were randomized according to the burden of human CD45+ cells to receive (1) IgG control or (2) 5 mg tafasitamab on day −7. Tafasitamab and IgG controls were administered via IP injection. On day 0, IgG control and tafasitamab groups received 3.5 × 106 of luciferase+ CART19. The expansion of CART19 was monitored via serial BLI, and CRS was monitored through the weight and well-being of the mice. (B) Mice were bled before CART19 cell infusion, and the tumor burden was reassessed. The leukemic blasts were determined by human CD45+, mouse CD45−, and human CD20+ cells (∗P < .05, t test: n = 3-6 per group). (C) CD19 expression in leukemic blasts was assessed using flow cytometry. CD19 absolute counts were determined using Quantum Simply Cellular kits (∗P < .05, t test: n = 3-5 per group). (D) The percentage reduction in the weights from baseline is shown. The first and second asterisks or “n.s.” are showing the statistical comparisons between IgG control vs 5 mg/kg tafasitamab at day −7 or IgG control vs untreated xenografts, respectively ∗∗P < .01, ∗∗∗∗P < .0001, 2-way ANOVA). (E) Analysis of CART19 cell expansion in vivo. IgG control and tafasitamab groups were imaged with bioluminescence on days 1 and 2 (∗P < .05, ∗∗P < .01, t test). (F) On day 4 of CART19 treatment, mice were bled and cytokines were analyzed with multiplex (∗∗∗P < .001, ∗∗∗∗P < .0001, t test). (G) Kaplan-Meier curve is shown. IgG control vs 5 mg/kg tafasitamab at day −7 HR, 17.81; 95% CI, 3.805 to 83.40; ∗∗P = .0003 (log-rank test), 5 mg/kg tafasitamab vs untreated xenografts, 0.04569; 95% CI, 0.008027 to 0.2601; ∗∗∗P = .0005 (log-rank test), IgG control vs untreated xenografts HR, 13.64; 95% CI, 2.855 to 65.17, ∗∗P = .0011 (log-rank test). (H) The weights of spleens are shown. At the end of the experiments, the mice were euthanized and the spleens were harvested (∗P < .05, 1-way ANOVA). (I) The sizes of spleens are shown. Splenic cells were analyzed using flow cytometry. Leukemic blasts and CART19 were defined as human CD45+, mouse CD45−, human CD20+, and human CD45+, mouse CD45−, human CD3+, respectively.

Sequential therapy with tafasitamab and CART19 cell decreased the severity of CRS and increased the antitumor effect of CART19. (A) Experimental scheme. NSG mice were first treated with 30 mg/kg of busulfan via IP injection. After 24 hours, the mice were injected with 5 × 106 of leukemic blasts derived from patients with R/R ALL. The mice were then monitored for tumor burden via PB sampling. Once human CD45+ cells within mouse blood reached >10 cells per μL, the mice were randomized according to the burden of human CD45+ cells to receive (1) IgG control or (2) 5 mg tafasitamab on day −7. Tafasitamab and IgG controls were administered via IP injection. On day 0, IgG control and tafasitamab groups received 3.5 × 106 of luciferase+ CART19. The expansion of CART19 was monitored via serial BLI, and CRS was monitored through the weight and well-being of the mice. (B) Mice were bled before CART19 cell infusion, and the tumor burden was reassessed. The leukemic blasts were determined by human CD45+, mouse CD45, and human CD20+ cells (∗P < .05, t test: n = 3-6 per group). (C) CD19 expression in leukemic blasts was assessed using flow cytometry. CD19 absolute counts were determined using Quantum Simply Cellular kits (∗P < .05, t test: n = 3-5 per group). (D) The percentage reduction in the weights from baseline is shown. The first and second asterisks or “n.s.” are showing the statistical comparisons between IgG control vs 5 mg/kg tafasitamab at day −7 or IgG control vs untreated xenografts, respectively ∗∗P < .01, ∗∗∗∗P < .0001, 2-way ANOVA). (E) Analysis of CART19 cell expansion in vivo. IgG control and tafasitamab groups were imaged with bioluminescence on days 1 and 2 (∗P < .05, ∗∗P < .01, t test). (F) On day 4 of CART19 treatment, mice were bled and cytokines were analyzed with multiplex (∗∗∗P < .001, ∗∗∗∗P < .0001, t test). (G) Kaplan-Meier curve is shown. IgG control vs 5 mg/kg tafasitamab at day −7 HR, 17.81; 95% CI, 3.805 to 83.40; ∗∗P = .0003 (log-rank test), 5 mg/kg tafasitamab vs untreated xenografts, 0.04569; 95% CI, 0.008027 to 0.2601; ∗∗∗P = .0005 (log-rank test), IgG control vs untreated xenografts HR, 13.64; 95% CI, 2.855 to 65.17, ∗∗P = .0011 (log-rank test). (H) The weights of spleens are shown. At the end of the experiments, the mice were euthanized and the spleens were harvested (∗P < .05, 1-way ANOVA). (I) The sizes of spleens are shown. Splenic cells were analyzed using flow cytometry. Leukemic blasts and CART19 were defined as human CD45+, mouse CD45, human CD20+, and human CD45+, mouse CD45, human CD3+, respectively.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal