Figure 5.
ISV relieves global and local immunosuppression. (A) TGF-β signaling scores (by patient) at the injected and uninjected sites for the indicated cell types. (B) Scatter plots depicting relationship between TGF-β signaling scores at day 8 at the uninjected site and percentage distant tumor reduction for T and NK cells. (C) PD-1 mean fluorescence intensity on memory CD8 T-cells across time points at the injected site and uninjected site. (D) Scatter plots depicting relationship between CD8 T-cell PD-1 mean fluorescence intensity on day 8 at the injected and uninjected sites and percentage distant tumor reduction. (E) Treatment-induced changes in TR1s (top) by flow cytometry and IL10 expression (bottom) by scRNA-seq at the injected site. (F) UMAP of TREGs, colored as per the subpopulations identified by unsupervised clustering. (G) Fold change in abundance of TREG subpopulations during therapy at the injected tumor site. (H) Treatment-induced changes in TFHs (left) by flow cytometry and IL4 expression (right) by scRNA-seq at the injected site. (I) Bar plot of correlation coefficients relating change in TFH and TR1 abundance by flow cytometry at the uninjected site and percentage distant tumor reduction. Correlations assessed using Spearman test. P values were calculated by 2-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for paired samples pretreatment (pre Tx) vs on treatment (day 8/week 6): ∗P < .05; ∗∗P < .01; ∗∗∗P < .001; ∗∗∗∗P < .0001. P values are only shown if P ≤ .05. Data point colors in (B) and (D) correspond to individual patients as in Figure 2(A-B).

ISV relieves global and local immunosuppression. (A) TGF-β signaling scores (by patient) at the injected and uninjected sites for the indicated cell types. (B) Scatter plots depicting relationship between TGF-β signaling scores at day 8 at the uninjected site and percentage distant tumor reduction for T and NK cells. (C) PD-1 mean fluorescence intensity on memory CD8 T-cells across time points at the injected site and uninjected site. (D) Scatter plots depicting relationship between CD8 T-cell PD-1 mean fluorescence intensity on day 8 at the injected and uninjected sites and percentage distant tumor reduction. (E) Treatment-induced changes in TR1s (top) by flow cytometry and IL10 expression (bottom) by scRNA-seq at the injected site. (F) UMAP of TREGs, colored as per the subpopulations identified by unsupervised clustering. (G) Fold change in abundance of TREG subpopulations during therapy at the injected tumor site. (H) Treatment-induced changes in TFHs (left) by flow cytometry and IL4 expression (right) by scRNA-seq at the injected site. (I) Bar plot of correlation coefficients relating change in TFH and TR1 abundance by flow cytometry at the uninjected site and percentage distant tumor reduction. Correlations assessed using Spearman test. P values were calculated by 2-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for paired samples pretreatment (pre Tx) vs on treatment (day 8/week 6): ∗P < .05; ∗∗P < .01; ∗∗∗P < .001; ∗∗∗∗P < .0001. P values are only shown if P ≤ .05. Data point colors in (B) and (D) correspond to individual patients as in Figure 2(A-B).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal