Figure 3.
MSCs induce thymic regeneration by repairing TECs. The proportion, number, and major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC II) levels of TECs, and Aire expression on mTECs were assessed in MSC-GVHD, non–MSC-GVHD, and non-GVHD recipients on day 20 and day 40 after HCT via flow cytometry. (A) Representative flow patterns of gated TECs shown as UEA-I (mTEC marker) vs Ly-51 (cortical TEC [cTEC] marker). (B) The proportion and number of mTECs and number of cTECs on day 20 and days 40 after HCT, data shown as the mean ± SE (n = 4-6). (C) Gated mTECs and cTECs shown as MHC II vs side scatter area (SSC-A). The percentage data of MHC II+ are shown as mean ± SE (n = 4-6). (D) Gated mTECs shown as Aire vs SSC-A. The percentage data of Aire-positive mTECs are shown as mean ± SE (n = 4-6). ∗∗P < .01; ∗∗∗P < .001; ∗∗∗∗P < .0001.

MSCs induce thymic regeneration by repairing TECs. The proportion, number, and major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC II) levels of TECs, and Aire expression on mTECs were assessed in MSC-GVHD, non–MSC-GVHD, and non-GVHD recipients on day 20 and day 40 after HCT via flow cytometry. (A) Representative flow patterns of gated TECs shown as UEA-I (mTEC marker) vs Ly-51 (cortical TEC [cTEC] marker). (B) The proportion and number of mTECs and number of cTECs on day 20 and days 40 after HCT, data shown as the mean ± SE (n = 4-6). (C) Gated mTECs and cTECs shown as MHC II vs side scatter area (SSC-A). The percentage data of MHC II+ are shown as mean ± SE (n = 4-6). (D) Gated mTECs shown as Aire vs SSC-A. The percentage data of Aire-positive mTECs are shown as mean ± SE (n = 4-6). ∗∗P < .01; ∗∗∗P < .001; ∗∗∗∗P < .0001.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal