Figure 3.
Distribution of caregivers who were‘high utilizers’ of multipleapproach-orientedcoping domains: emotional support, reframe, active, and acceptance. The distribution of caregivers who were “high utilizers” of approach-oriented coping domains defined as caregivers who scored above the median on a coping domain is shown. For the acceptance coping domain, “high utilizers” were patients who scored the median (8) because the median was the maximum score for that domain. Although 21% of patients scored below the median or median (for acceptance) for all approach-oriented coping domains, 24%, 24%, 24%, and 6.5% were high approach-oriented copers based on 1, 2, 3, and 4 domains, respectively.

Distribution of caregivers who were‘high utilizers’ of multipleapproach-orientedcoping domains: emotional support, reframe, active, and acceptance. The distribution of caregivers who were “high utilizers” of approach-oriented coping domains defined as caregivers who scored above the median on a coping domain is shown. For the acceptance coping domain, “high utilizers” were patients who scored the median (8) because the median was the maximum score for that domain. Although 21% of patients scored below the median or median (for acceptance) for all approach-oriented coping domains, 24%, 24%, 24%, and 6.5% were high approach-oriented copers based on 1, 2, 3, and 4 domains, respectively.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal