Figure 3.
Comparative proteomics reveals highly distorted proteome of KLF1+/E325K cells. (A) Erythroid cell population types in (i) expanding (day 0) WT and KLF1+/E325K and (ii) on day 2 of differentiation. (B) PCA of comparative quantitative proteomic data for WT (red) and KLF1+/E325K (blue) during expansion (day 0; triangles) and on day 2 of differentiation (circles). (C) Volcano plots show significantly differentially expressed proteins in WT and KLF1+/E325K during (i) expansion (day 0) and on (ii) day 2 of differentiation. P-value(-log10) is plotted against the log2(KLF1+/E325K/WT). Vertical red lines indicate ±1.0 log2 fold change. The horizontal red line indicates significantly differentially expressed proteins (P = .05 before logarithmic transformation). Yellow proteins passed P = .05 and red proteins passed P = .05 and also had a ±1.0 log2 fold change or higher. Proteins passing false discovery rate calculations (FDR) are shown as triangles, those that failed as circles.

Comparative proteomics reveals highly distorted proteome of KLF1+/E325K cells. (A) Erythroid cell population types in (i) expanding (day 0) WT and KLF1+/E325K and (ii) on day 2 of differentiation. (B) PCA of comparative quantitative proteomic data for WT (red) and KLF1+/E325K (blue) during expansion (day 0; triangles) and on day 2 of differentiation (circles). (C) Volcano plots show significantly differentially expressed proteins in WT and KLF1+/E325K during (i) expansion (day 0) and on (ii) day 2 of differentiation. P-value(-log10) is plotted against the log2(KLF1+/E325K/WT). Vertical red lines indicate ±1.0 log2 fold change. The horizontal red line indicates significantly differentially expressed proteins (P = .05 before logarithmic transformation). Yellow proteins passed P = .05 and red proteins passed P = .05 and also had a ±1.0 log2 fold change or higher. Proteins passing false discovery rate calculations (FDR) are shown as triangles, those that failed as circles.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal