Figure 6.
EBIs and EBI macrophages are increased following administration of Epo, permitting characterization of EBI macrophages by CITE-seq. IFC analysis of EBIs from saline solution–treated (A) vs Epo-treated (B) mouse BM demonstrates an increase not only in the size of EBIs (increased CD71+ area) but also in the number of EBIs after Epo stimulation, indicating a parallel increase in the number of EBI macrophages. Each point represents an EBI observed by IFC; all EBIs observed in one biological replicate are shown. Spearman correlation coefficient r values are shown on the graphs (P < .0001). (C) The number of EBIs after Epo stimulation increased approximately 4-fold by IFC evaluation (n = 4 biologic repeats, mean ± SD shown in the bar graph; ∗∗P = .002 comparing raw values with unpaired Student t test). (D) Ratio of CD11b+:CD71+ area within each EBI (median shown in graph; ∗∗∗∗P < .0001 by Mann-Whitney test). (E,F) ICGS2 (Iterative Clustering and Guide-gene selection version 2) analysis and CellHarmony of single-cell CITE-seq data collected from the BM clusters enriched in EBIs of saline solution–treated (E) and Epo-treated (F) BM reveals 28 distinct clusters. Clusters 4 and 20 are composed of early erythroblasts remaining despite Ter119+ depletion; clusters 18, 22, 33, 39, and 12 are granulocyte precursors that were also not completely removed despite depletion for Ly6G; and clusters 9, 13, 15, 23, and 19 have a transcriptome compatible with macrophage/monocyte lineage. Cluster 7 demonstrates transcriptomic characteristics of plasmacytoid dendritic cells, such as Siglech, Bst2, and Ly6d, and therefore is not considered a macrophage subset. (G) Fold change in relative frequencies of the cells in the macrophage/monocyte, erythroid, and granulocytic clusters at baseline vs with Epo treatment as indicated by percentage of captured cells in each sample.

EBIs and EBI macrophages are increased following administration of Epo, permitting characterization of EBI macrophages by CITE-seq. IFC analysis of EBIs from saline solution–treated (A) vs Epo-treated (B) mouse BM demonstrates an increase not only in the size of EBIs (increased CD71+ area) but also in the number of EBIs after Epo stimulation, indicating a parallel increase in the number of EBI macrophages. Each point represents an EBI observed by IFC; all EBIs observed in one biological replicate are shown. Spearman correlation coefficient r values are shown on the graphs (P < .0001). (C) The number of EBIs after Epo stimulation increased approximately 4-fold by IFC evaluation (n = 4 biologic repeats, mean ± SD shown in the bar graph; ∗∗P = .002 comparing raw values with unpaired Student t test). (D) Ratio of CD11b+:CD71+ area within each EBI (median shown in graph; ∗∗∗∗P < .0001 by Mann-Whitney test). (E,F) ICGS2 (Iterative Clustering and Guide-gene selection version 2) analysis and CellHarmony of single-cell CITE-seq data collected from the BM clusters enriched in EBIs of saline solution–treated (E) and Epo-treated (F) BM reveals 28 distinct clusters. Clusters 4 and 20 are composed of early erythroblasts remaining despite Ter119+ depletion; clusters 18, 22, 33, 39, and 12 are granulocyte precursors that were also not completely removed despite depletion for Ly6G; and clusters 9, 13, 15, 23, and 19 have a transcriptome compatible with macrophage/monocyte lineage. Cluster 7 demonstrates transcriptomic characteristics of plasmacytoid dendritic cells, such as Siglech, Bst2, and Ly6d, and therefore is not considered a macrophage subset. (G) Fold change in relative frequencies of the cells in the macrophage/monocyte, erythroid, and granulocytic clusters at baseline vs with Epo treatment as indicated by percentage of captured cells in each sample.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal