Figure 3.
Correction of the SCD mutation by ex vivo HSC transduction. (A) Schematic of the experiment. BM Lin− cells were harvested from CD46/Townes mice and transduced with HDAd-PE5max at an MOI of 500 vp/cell. Cells were then either cultured for 3 days or transplanted into lethally irradiated C57BL/6 mice at 24 hours after transduction. The mice were followed for 16 weeks. For further evaluation of long-term repopulating cells, BM Lin− cells from these mice were then used for secondary transplantation and these mice were monitored for another 16 weeks. (B and C) Analyses of day 3 cultures and colonies. (B) Target base conversions and indel frequency measured using NGS. Lin− cells isolated from 3 independent donors were analyzed (n = 3 animals). (C) Allelic analysis in single Lin– cell–derived progenitor colonies (n = 30). Editing was measured using Sanger sequencing at day 11 after plating of transduced Lin– cells derived from a representative mouse. (D-H) Analyses of transplanted primary mice. (D) Engraftment of HDAd-PE5max–transduced HSCs measured using flow cytometry of human CD46 expression in PBMCs. (E) Analysis of target site editing (T>A, sickle site and G>A, silent PAM site) using Sanger sequencing in PBMCs at different time points after transplantation (n = 5 animals). (F) Editing (Sanger) at week 16 in PBMCs, splenocytes, BM MNCs, BM Lin– cells and pooled progenitor colonies from plated Lin– cells (Pooled CFU). (G) Target base conversions and indel frequency in BM MNCs (week 16) measured using NGS. (H) Allelic analysis in progenitor colonies derived from week-16 BM Lin– cells (n = 36). Colonies from 3 individual mice were analyzed using Sanger sequencing (n = 12 for each mouse). All colonies had a 100% editing rate. (I-K). Analyses of secondary recipients similar to panels D-H. For panels C, E, F, H, J, and K, editing was measured using Sanger sequencing. For panels D-G, I-K, each symbol represents an individual mouse.

Correction of the SCD mutation by ex vivo HSC transduction. (A) Schematic of the experiment. BM Lin cells were harvested from CD46/Townes mice and transduced with HDAd-PE5max at an MOI of 500 vp/cell. Cells were then either cultured for 3 days or transplanted into lethally irradiated C57BL/6 mice at 24 hours after transduction. The mice were followed for 16 weeks. For further evaluation of long-term repopulating cells, BM Lin cells from these mice were then used for secondary transplantation and these mice were monitored for another 16 weeks. (B and C) Analyses of day 3 cultures and colonies. (B) Target base conversions and indel frequency measured using NGS. Lin cells isolated from 3 independent donors were analyzed (n = 3 animals). (C) Allelic analysis in single Lin cell–derived progenitor colonies (n = 30). Editing was measured using Sanger sequencing at day 11 after plating of transduced Lin cells derived from a representative mouse. (D-H) Analyses of transplanted primary mice. (D) Engraftment of HDAd-PE5max–transduced HSCs measured using flow cytometry of human CD46 expression in PBMCs. (E) Analysis of target site editing (T>A, sickle site and G>A, silent PAM site) using Sanger sequencing in PBMCs at different time points after transplantation (n = 5 animals). (F) Editing (Sanger) at week 16 in PBMCs, splenocytes, BM MNCs, BM Lin cells and pooled progenitor colonies from plated Lin cells (Pooled CFU). (G) Target base conversions and indel frequency in BM MNCs (week 16) measured using NGS. (H) Allelic analysis in progenitor colonies derived from week-16 BM Lin cells (n = 36). Colonies from 3 individual mice were analyzed using Sanger sequencing (n = 12 for each mouse). All colonies had a 100% editing rate. (I-K). Analyses of secondary recipients similar to panels D-H. For panels C, E, F, H, J, and K, editing was measured using Sanger sequencing. For panels D-G, I-K, each symbol represents an individual mouse.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal