Figure 5.
Anti-ADAMTS13 autoantibody immunoprofiles in the Japanese iTTP cohort. Immunoprofiles were formed based on the presence or absence of anti-M, anti-DT, anti-CS, anti-T2-T5, anti-T6-T8, and anti–CUB1-2 autoantibodies. The green and red cells indicate the presence and absence of anti-M, anti-DT, anti-CS, anti-T2-T5, anti-T6-T8, and anti–CUB1-2 autoantibodies, respectively (left graph). The percentage of patients with a specific immunoprofile is depicted in the right graph. The same profiles were found as the ones described in our previous report based on a mainly Caucasian cohort,13 except for profiles 10, 17, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, and 31. Profiles 34 to 39 (highlighted in orange) were only detected in the Japanese cohort.

Anti-ADAMTS13 autoantibody immunoprofiles in the Japanese iTTP cohort. Immunoprofiles were formed based on the presence or absence of anti-M, anti-DT, anti-CS, anti-T2-T5, anti-T6-T8, and anti–CUB1-2 autoantibodies. The green and red cells indicate the presence and absence of anti-M, anti-DT, anti-CS, anti-T2-T5, anti-T6-T8, and anti–CUB1-2 autoantibodies, respectively (left graph). The percentage of patients with a specific immunoprofile is depicted in the right graph. The same profiles were found as the ones described in our previous report based on a mainly Caucasian cohort,13 except for profiles 10, 17, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, and 31. Profiles 34 to 39 (highlighted in orange) were only detected in the Japanese cohort.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal