Figure 3.
Engraftment of WT and Tet2−/− cells collected and processed in 3% O2 vs ambient air (∼21% O2), assessed by competitive BM transplantation and limiting-dilution analysis. Five recipient mice per group are shown. Donor (CD45.2+) cells were injected intravenously at doses of 12 500, 25 000, and 50 000 cells into lethally irradiated F1 host mice (CD45.1+CD45.2+) in air or physioxia. Competitor Boy/J BM cells (CD45.1+) were injected intravenously at 100 000 cells in air. The percentage of donor-derived cells in the PB was assessed by flow cytometry at months (M) 1, 2, and 4 (A). The percentage of donor-derived cells in the BM was assessed at month 4 (B). Poisson statistical analysis from the limiting-dilution transplantation PB data (C) and BM (E) are shown. Solid line indicates best-fit linear model. Dotted lines represent 95% confidence intervals. Squares represent the percentage of negative mice for each dose. Triangles indicate that all tested mice were positive in this group. Numbers of CRUs in 106 cells in PB (D) and BM (F) are shown. (G) The myeloid (CD11b+ and GR1+)/lymphoid (CD3+ and B220+) ratio in the PB at month 4 was assessed by flow cytometry. Engraftment in secondary recipients at month 4 (H) is shown. Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. *P < .05; ****P < .0001 when analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance with a post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison test and Poisson statistical analysis. CRUs, competitive repopulating units; ns, not significant.

Engraftment of WT and Tet2−/− cells collected and processed in 3% O2 vs ambient air (∼21% O2), assessed by competitive BM transplantation and limiting-dilution analysis. Five recipient mice per group are shown. Donor (CD45.2+) cells were injected intravenously at doses of 12 500, 25 000, and 50 000 cells into lethally irradiated F1 host mice (CD45.1+CD45.2+) in air or physioxia. Competitor Boy/J BM cells (CD45.1+) were injected intravenously at 100 000 cells in air. The percentage of donor-derived cells in the PB was assessed by flow cytometry at months (M) 1, 2, and 4 (A). The percentage of donor-derived cells in the BM was assessed at month 4 (B). Poisson statistical analysis from the limiting-dilution transplantation PB data (C) and BM (E) are shown. Solid line indicates best-fit linear model. Dotted lines represent 95% confidence intervals. Squares represent the percentage of negative mice for each dose. Triangles indicate that all tested mice were positive in this group. Numbers of CRUs in 106 cells in PB (D) and BM (F) are shown. (G) The myeloid (CD11b+ and GR1+)/lymphoid (CD3+ and B220+) ratio in the PB at month 4 was assessed by flow cytometry. Engraftment in secondary recipients at month 4 (H) is shown. Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. *P < .05; ****P < .0001 when analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance with a post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison test and Poisson statistical analysis. CRUs, competitive repopulating units; ns, not significant.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal