Figure 4.
Pharmacokinetic model of plasma FVIII exposure after AAV-FVIII delivery defines an immunogenicity threshold. (A) These graphs display the FVIII production (or exposure) rate, kFVIII, and the corresponding cumulative FVIII exposure, AUCFVIII, for each AAV-FVIII–treated animal through day 15 (n = 66). Red curves represent animals that developed an inhibitor response, and black curves represent the animals that did not develop inhibitors. The proposed immunogenicity threshold is outlined in blue and was determined by linear regression with shared parameters. (B) ID50 values were calculated by simple logistic regression analysis (ID50 = the value predicted to induce inhibitor development in 50% of AAV-FVIII–treated subjects): (i) day 5 kFVIII, (ii) day 10 kFVIII, (iii) day 5 AUCFVIII, (iv) day 10 AUCFVIII (likelihood ratio test [LRT] of the β1 variable was set at P < .05 for significance and brackets indicate the 95% CI). (C) Contingency analysis was performed based on the inhibitor incidence (count) of animals that met the kFVIII threshold by day 10 (2-sided Fisher’s exact test with significance set at P < .05; brackets indicate 95% CI; ARI, attributable risk increase; RR, risk ratio). (D) Survival curve indicates occurrence of inhibitors for animals with day 5 kFVIII values ≥ ID50 compared with those below the ID50. The median time to inhibitors with kFVIII ≥ 4.49 = 30 days. (χ2 = 66.95, df = 1, P < .0001). (E) Correlation of day 5 kFVIII values with the time to anti-FVIII IgG incidence. (Spearman r = −0.7333; 95% CI, −0.8907, −0.4189; P = .0002). (F) Median day 5 kFVIII values by vector dose for each AAV-FVIII vector. Error bars indicate IQR. Values below the red dashed line indicate a day 5 kFVIII = 0, meaning that there was no detectable FVIII activity by chromogenic assay 5 days after vector delivery. Both the vector design and dose factors have a significant impact on the day 5 kFVIII (main effects 2-way ANOVA, P < .0001).

Pharmacokinetic model of plasma FVIII exposure after AAV-FVIII delivery defines an immunogenicity threshold. (A) These graphs display the FVIII production (or exposure) rate, kFVIII, and the corresponding cumulative FVIII exposure, AUCFVIII, for each AAV-FVIII–treated animal through day 15 (n = 66). Red curves represent animals that developed an inhibitor response, and black curves represent the animals that did not develop inhibitors. The proposed immunogenicity threshold is outlined in blue and was determined by linear regression with shared parameters. (B) ID50 values were calculated by simple logistic regression analysis (ID50 = the value predicted to induce inhibitor development in 50% of AAV-FVIII–treated subjects): (i) day 5 kFVIII, (ii) day 10 kFVIII, (iii) day 5 AUCFVIII, (iv) day 10 AUCFVIII (likelihood ratio test [LRT] of the β1 variable was set at P < .05 for significance and brackets indicate the 95% CI). (C) Contingency analysis was performed based on the inhibitor incidence (count) of animals that met the kFVIII threshold by day 10 (2-sided Fisher’s exact test with significance set at P < .05; brackets indicate 95% CI; ARI, attributable risk increase; RR, risk ratio). (D) Survival curve indicates occurrence of inhibitors for animals with day 5 kFVIII values ≥ ID50 compared with those below the ID50. The median time to inhibitors with kFVIII ≥ 4.49 = 30 days. (χ2 = 66.95, df = 1, P < .0001). (E) Correlation of day 5 kFVIII values with the time to anti-FVIII IgG incidence. (Spearman r = −0.7333; 95% CI, −0.8907, −0.4189; P = .0002). (F) Median day 5 kFVIII values by vector dose for each AAV-FVIII vector. Error bars indicate IQR. Values below the red dashed line indicate a day 5 kFVIII = 0, meaning that there was no detectable FVIII activity by chromogenic assay 5 days after vector delivery. Both the vector design and dose factors have a significant impact on the day 5 kFVIII (main effects 2-way ANOVA, P < .0001).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal