Univariable analysis by translocation partner. (A) CIF curves for the outcome of relapse, where patients with KMT2A rearrangement were stratified by translocation partner. No significant differences were noted between the groups. Log-rank, P = .27. (B) CIF curves for the outcome of NRM, where patients with KMT2A rearrangement were stratified by translocation partner. No significant differences were noted between the groups. Log-rank, P = .61. (C) Kaplan-Meier curves for the outcome of LFS, where patients with KMT2A rearrangement were stratified by translocation partner. No significant differences were noted between the groups. Log-rank, P = .43. (D) Kaplan-Meier curves for the outcome of OS, where patients with KMT2A rearrangement were stratified by translocation partner. No significant differences were noted between the groups. Log-rank, P = .27.