Figure 1.
Expansion and activation of cTfh in patients with pES. (A) Representative FItSNE plots showing frequency and activation status of cTfh cells in patient with pES and HC where CD4+ T cells were first manually gated for total memory cells (CD45RA−) and then down-sampled to equal number of cells. CXCR5+ cells were gated on CD45RA−CD4+ T cells and subsequently gated for HLA-DR+ or PD-1+ cells. Expression of cTfh and activation markers on cTfh (ie, PD-1+ and HLA-DR+) are shown in different colors. Overlaid expression of PD-1+, HLA-DR+, and CXCR5+ markers are shown at the extreme right for both HC and pES. (B-C) Plots showing percentage of cTfh as CXCR5+CD45RA−CD4+ T and CXCR5+PD-1+CD45RA−CD4+ T subsets in HCs (n = 24), patients with pES (n = 24), and patients with cITP (n = 22). (D) Plot showing ratio of PD-1+ cTfh vs PD-1− cTfh in HCs, patients with pES, and patients with cITP. (E-G) Percentage of CXCR5+HLA-DR+, CXCR5+Tim3+, and CXCR5+CD57+ expression on total memory CD4+ T cells in different patient groups. Data represent mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) values for each group. Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test for nonnormally distributed samples and ordinary 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test for normally distributed samples were used for statistical comparison. ***P < .001; ****P < .0001; ns, not significant.

Expansion and activation of cTfh in patients with pES. (A) Representative FItSNE plots showing frequency and activation status of cTfh cells in patient with pES and HC where CD4+ T cells were first manually gated for total memory cells (CD45RA) and then down-sampled to equal number of cells. CXCR5+ cells were gated on CD45RACD4+ T cells and subsequently gated for HLA-DR+ or PD-1+ cells. Expression of cTfh and activation markers on cTfh (ie, PD-1+ and HLA-DR+) are shown in different colors. Overlaid expression of PD-1+, HLA-DR+, and CXCR5+ markers are shown at the extreme right for both HC and pES. (B-C) Plots showing percentage of cTfh as CXCR5+CD45RACD4+ T and CXCR5+PD-1+CD45RACD4+ T subsets in HCs (n = 24), patients with pES (n = 24), and patients with cITP (n = 22). (D) Plot showing ratio of PD-1+ cTfh vs PD-1 cTfh in HCs, patients with pES, and patients with cITP. (E-G) Percentage of CXCR5+HLA-DR+, CXCR5+Tim3+, and CXCR5+CD57+ expression on total memory CD4+ T cells in different patient groups. Data represent mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) values for each group. Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test for nonnormally distributed samples and ordinary 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test for normally distributed samples were used for statistical comparison. ***P < .001; ****P < .0001; ns, not significant.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal