Figure 5.
Survival analysis according to CEBPA and GATA2 mutational status within the cohort of 4461 patients receiving intensive treatment. Kaplan-Meier plots showing OS (A) and EFS (B) of CEBPAwt, compared with CEBPAbi/GATA2wt (n = 82), CEBPAbi/GATA2mut (n = 46), CEBPAsmbZIP/GATA2wt(n = 31), CEBPAsmbZIP/GATA2mut (n = 18) mutant cases. Survival analysis according to CEBPA mutation status and TET2 status within a cohort of 4461 patients. Kaplan-Meier plots showing OS (C) and EFS (D) of CEBPAwt, compared with CEBPAbi/TET2wt (n = 98), CEBPAbi/TET2mut (n = 30), CEBPAsmbZIP/TET2wt (n = 33), CEBPAsmbZIP/TET2mut (n = 16) mutant cases. Numbers of patients at risk and results of log-rank tests from pairwise comparisons are provided below the x-axis.

Survival analysis according to CEBPA and GATA2 mutational status within the cohort of 4461 patients receiving intensive treatment. Kaplan-Meier plots showing OS (A) and EFS (B) of CEBPAwt, compared with CEBPAbi/GATA2wt (n = 82), CEBPAbi/GATA2mut (n = 46), CEBPAsmbZIP/GATA2wt(n = 31), CEBPAsmbZIP/GATA2mut (n = 18) mutant cases. Survival analysis according to CEBPA mutation status and TET2 status within a cohort of 4461 patients. Kaplan-Meier plots showing OS (C) and EFS (D) of CEBPAwt, compared with CEBPAbi/TET2wt (n = 98), CEBPAbi/TET2mut (n = 30), CEBPAsmbZIP/TET2wt (n = 33), CEBPAsmbZIP/TET2mut (n = 16) mutant cases. Numbers of patients at risk and results of log-rank tests from pairwise comparisons are provided below the x-axis.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal