Figure 3.
Disease response and treatment status timelines for deep responders. Patients who received continuous venetoclax (n = 14) (A) or limited-duration venetoclax (n = 19) (B). In each panel, patients are grouped by their best iwCLL response category. In panel B, the 4 patients receiving retreatment with venetoclax or venetoclax plus rituximab after progression are grouped together for ease of reference. aThe first patient received a second course of rituximab and increased dose of venetoclax to 600 mg/day upon progression, and then achieved CR with uMRD. bPatient was retreated with rituximab for thrombocytopenia unrelated to CLL progression; the patient withdrew because of myelodysplasia 6 months after data cutoff for the publication. cThe patient proceeded to elective allograft in CR. dPD assessment data were not included in the clinical database at the time of the data cutoff. nPR, nodular PR; PD, progressive disease; Ven, venetoclax.

Disease response and treatment status timelines for deep responders. Patients who received continuous venetoclax (n = 14) (A) or limited-duration venetoclax (n = 19) (B). In each panel, patients are grouped by their best iwCLL response category. In panel B, the 4 patients receiving retreatment with venetoclax or venetoclax plus rituximab after progression are grouped together for ease of reference. aThe first patient received a second course of rituximab and increased dose of venetoclax to 600 mg/day upon progression, and then achieved CR with uMRD. bPatient was retreated with rituximab for thrombocytopenia unrelated to CLL progression; the patient withdrew because of myelodysplasia 6 months after data cutoff for the publication. cThe patient proceeded to elective allograft in CR. dPD assessment data were not included in the clinical database at the time of the data cutoff. nPR, nodular PR; PD, progressive disease; Ven, venetoclax.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal