Figure 4.
Survival probabilities of EBV+ DLBCL-NOS vs EBV− DLBCL-NOS patients treated with a curative-intent regimen. (A-B) PFS (A) and OS (B) for the 56 EBV+ DLBCL-NOS compared with the 425 EBV− DLBCL-NOS cases. Both PFS and OS are not significantly between EBV+ DLBCL-NOS and EBV− DLBCL-NOS. At 5 years, PFS of EBV+ DLBCL-NOS vs EBV− DLBCL-NOS is 65.6% (95% CI, 59.2-72) and 49.6% (95% CI, 46.5-52.7), respectively (P = .180); and OS of EBV+ DLBCL-NOS vs EBV− DLBCL-NOS is 68.3% (95% CI, 61.9-74.7) and 64.8% (95% CI, 61.6-68), respectively (P = .730).

Survival probabilities of EBV+ DLBCL-NOS vs EBV DLBCL-NOS patients treated with a curative-intent regimen. (A-B) PFS (A) and OS (B) for the 56 EBV+ DLBCL-NOS compared with the 425 EBV DLBCL-NOS cases. Both PFS and OS are not significantly between EBV+ DLBCL-NOS and EBV DLBCL-NOS. At 5 years, PFS of EBV+ DLBCL-NOS vs EBV DLBCL-NOS is 65.6% (95% CI, 59.2-72) and 49.6% (95% CI, 46.5-52.7), respectively (P = .180); and OS of EBV+ DLBCL-NOS vs EBV DLBCL-NOS is 68.3% (95% CI, 61.9-74.7) and 64.8% (95% CI, 61.6-68), respectively (P = .730).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal