Table 2.

Clinical outcomes by treatment group

Study outcome, n (%)Rivaroxaban, n = 90Standard anticoagulation, n = 36Absolute risk difference (95% CI), %
Recurrent VTE 0 (−11 to 4.2) 
Other clinically relevant venous thrombosis 1 (1.1) 1 (2.8) −1.7 (−14 to 3.6) 
Major bleeding 0 (−11 to 4.2) 
Clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding 3 (3.3) 3.3 (−6.4 to 9.7) 
 Blood in nasogastric tube 
 Hematemesis 
 Hematoma at catheter puncture site* 
CVC-related infection 7 (7.8) 3 (8.3) −0.6 (−10 to 11) 
Repeat imaging    
 Normalized 42 (47) 15 (42)  
 Improved 26 (29) 12 (33)  
 Unchanged 2 (2.2) 5 (14)  
 Deteriorated 1 (1.1)  
 Uncertain 19 (21) 4 (11)  
Study outcome, n (%)Rivaroxaban, n = 90Standard anticoagulation, n = 36Absolute risk difference (95% CI), %
Recurrent VTE 0 (−11 to 4.2) 
Other clinically relevant venous thrombosis 1 (1.1) 1 (2.8) −1.7 (−14 to 3.6) 
Major bleeding 0 (−11 to 4.2) 
Clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding 3 (3.3) 3.3 (−6.4 to 9.7) 
 Blood in nasogastric tube 
 Hematemesis 
 Hematoma at catheter puncture site* 
CVC-related infection 7 (7.8) 3 (8.3) −0.6 (−10 to 11) 
Repeat imaging    
 Normalized 42 (47) 15 (42)  
 Improved 26 (29) 12 (33)  
 Unchanged 2 (2.2) 5 (14)  
 Deteriorated 1 (1.1)  
 Uncertain 19 (21) 4 (11)  

Twenty-three children had a repeat imaging outcome classified as uncertain because the imaging was not performed or it was not evaluable (n = 4), study medication was continued for >7 days after repeat imaging (n = 8), or repeat imaging was done >7 days after stop study medication (n = 11). Of these children, 19 had a repeat imaging that was normalized (n = 12), improved (n = 6), or unchanged (n = 1).

*

Bleeding occurred during initial heparinization.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal