Table 2.

CAR T-cell therapy in DLBCL patients failing CD19-directed treatment

Patients (N = 14)
CD19 expression on lymphoma cells after loncastuximab tesirine therapy, n (%)  
 Positive 10 (71) 
 Not checked 4 (29) 
Median interval between loncastuximab tesirine and CAR T-cell therapy (range), d 120 (22-600) 
Additional therapy between loncastuximab tesirine and CAR T-cell therapy, n (%)  
 Yes* 6 (43) 
 No 8 (57) 
Disease status before CAR T-cell therapy, n (%)  
 Refractory disease 5 (36) 
 Progressive disease 8 (57) 
 Partial remission 1 (7) 
Flu/Cy lymphodepletion, n (%) 14 (100) 
Type of CAR T-cell therapy, n (%)  
 Axicabtagene ciloleucel 5 (36) 
 Tisagenlecleucel 2 (14) 
 Investigational targeting CD19 4 (29) 
 JCAR017 3 (21) 
Best response to CAR T-cell therapy, n (%)  
 Complete response 6 (43) 
 Partial response 1 (7) 
 Refractory disease 7 (50) 
CRS grade, n (%)  
 None 6 (43) 
 1 3 (21) 
 2 4 (29) 
 3 1 (7) 
ICANS grade, n (%)  
 None 8 (57) 
 1 4 (29) 
 2 1 (7) 
 3 0 (0) 
 4 1 (7) 
Patients (N = 14)
CD19 expression on lymphoma cells after loncastuximab tesirine therapy, n (%)  
 Positive 10 (71) 
 Not checked 4 (29) 
Median interval between loncastuximab tesirine and CAR T-cell therapy (range), d 120 (22-600) 
Additional therapy between loncastuximab tesirine and CAR T-cell therapy, n (%)  
 Yes* 6 (43) 
 No 8 (57) 
Disease status before CAR T-cell therapy, n (%)  
 Refractory disease 5 (36) 
 Progressive disease 8 (57) 
 Partial remission 1 (7) 
Flu/Cy lymphodepletion, n (%) 14 (100) 
Type of CAR T-cell therapy, n (%)  
 Axicabtagene ciloleucel 5 (36) 
 Tisagenlecleucel 2 (14) 
 Investigational targeting CD19 4 (29) 
 JCAR017 3 (21) 
Best response to CAR T-cell therapy, n (%)  
 Complete response 6 (43) 
 Partial response 1 (7) 
 Refractory disease 7 (50) 
CRS grade, n (%)  
 None 6 (43) 
 1 3 (21) 
 2 4 (29) 
 3 1 (7) 
ICANS grade, n (%)  
 None 8 (57) 
 1 4 (29) 
 2 1 (7) 
 3 0 (0) 
 4 1 (7) 

CRS, cytokine release syndrome; Flu/Cy, lymphodepletion with fludarabine/cyclophosphamide.

*

Additional therapy between loncastuximab tesirine and CAR T-cell therapy included radiation alone (n = 3), radiation, ifosphamide/vinblastine/etoposide (n = 1), radiation; rituximab/methotrexate (n = 1), lenalidomide, anti-CD47 antibody, ibrutinib (n = 1).

One patient each received a CD19/CD22-directed CAR, and a CD19/CD20-directed CAR. Neither patient responded to CAR treatment.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal