Table 3.

Summary of feedback and performance of candidate GBIs

Domains, subdomains and GBIsFeedback first round, (%/%)Performance first round, % (%/%)Feedback second round, (%/%)Performance second round, % (%/%)Final rating outcomes
Total 23: 14/9 (100/100)  26: 16/10 (100/100)   
Diagnosis, n = 23      
 1.1 Basic diagnostic workup      
  1.1.1 WHO 2016 classification 14/4 (100/44) 83 (84/80) 16/4 (100/40) 94 (93/100) Selected 
  1.1.2 Peripheral blood count and smear 14/4 (100/44) 86 (86/85) 16/4 (100/40) 89 (89/85) Selected 
  1.1.3 Bone marrow cytology 14/4 (100/44) 84 (86/80) 16/4 (100/40) 95 (95/95) Selected 
  1.1.4 Iron staining 14/4 (100/44) 78 (76/85) 16/4 (100/40) 96 (96/95) Selected 
  1.1.5 Bone marrow histology including immunohistochemistry 13/4 (93/44) 79 (78/80) 16/4 (100/40) 85 (83/95) Selected 
  1.1.6 Cytogenetic analysis 13/4 (93/44) 88 (87/70) 16/4 (100/40) 95 (95/95) Selected 
 1.2 Supplementary diagnostic workup      
  1.2.1 Cytochemistry 13/2 (93/22) 44 (44/50) — — Dropped after first round 
  1.2.2 Immunophenotyping 13/2 (93/22) 52 (52/60) — — Dropped after first round 
  1.2.3 Fluorescence in situ hybridization 13/2 (93/22) 62 (65/40) — — Dropped after first round 
  1.2.4 Microarray comparative genomic hybridization 13/1 (93/11) 41 (39/80) — — Dropped after first round 
  1.2.5 Molecular diagnostics/NGS 13/1 (93/11) 76 (75/100) 16/3 (100/30) 85 (84/93) Selected 
 1.3 Diagnostic workup related to treatment      
  1.3.1 Serum erythropoietin in patients with symptomatic anemia 13/3 (93/30) 90 (88/100) 16/4 (100/40) 93 (92/95) Selected 
  1.3.2 Monitoring iron status 13/3 (93/30) 92 (91/100) 16/4 (100/40) 87 (85/95) Selected 
  1.3.3 TP53 mutation status in MDS del(5q) 13/2 (93/22) 85 (85/100) 16/3 (100/30) 86 (88/80) Selected 
1.4 Risk stratification      
  1.4.1 Disease-based risk stratification      
   1.4.1.1 Disease-based risk stratification according to IPSS 13/2 (93/22) 79 (76/100) — — Merged with 1.4.1.2 
   1.4.1.2 Disease-based risk stratification according to IPSS/IPSS-R 13/2 (93/22) 93 (92/100) 16/3 (100/30) 98 (100/87) Selected 
   1.4.1.3 Disease-based risk stratification according to WPSS 13/2 (93/22) 64 (59/100) — — Dropped after first round 
  1.4.2 Patient-based risk stratification      
   1.4.2.1 Patient-based risk stratification 13/2 (93/22) 74 (73/84) 16/4 (100/40) 72 (70/80) Selected 
   1.4.2.2 Assessment for germline predisposition for inherited hematological malignancy syndromes 13/2 (93/22) 56 (55/70) — — Dropped after first round 
1.5 Follow-up/outcomes      
  1.5.1 PROs* 13/6 (93/67) 62 (59/70) 9/6 (56/60) 73 (64/87) Selected after reevaluation 
  1.5.2 Response assessment 13/5 (93/56) 69 (65/76) 16/3 (100/30) 89 (93/73) Selected 
  1.5.3 Toxicity assessment 13/7 (93/78) 63 (64/57) 16/8 (100/80) 68 (60/85) Dropped after second round 
  1.5.4 Geriatric assessment* 12/5 (86/56) 51 (46/64) 5/4 (31/40) 62 (44/85) Dropped after reevaluation 
Therapy, n = 21      
 2.1 Supportive care      
  2.1.1 Overtreatment of lower-risk MDS patients with asymptomatic cytopenia 13/3 (93/30) 63 (63/67) 16/3 (100/30) 64 (65/60) Dropped after second round 
  2.1.2 Transfusions      
   2.1.2.1 Transfusions of red blood cell concentrates 13/3 (93/30) 73 (79/47) 16/4 (100/40) 84 (86/75) Selected 
   2.1.2.2 Iron chelation 13/3 (93/30) 69 (63/100) 16/3 (100/30) 64 (61/80) Dropped after second round 
   2.1.2.3 Transfusions of platelet concentrates 13/4 (93/44) 78 (77/80) 16/4 (100/50) 84 (84/84) Selected 
  2.1.3 Antibacterial prophylaxis 13/3 (93/30) 60 (59/81) — — Dropped after first round 
  2.1.4 Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for infections 13/2 (93/22) 54 (56/40) — — Dropped after first round 
 2.2 Lower-risk      
  2.2.1 Anemia      
   2.2.1.1 ESAs 13/3 (93/30) 89 (88/100) 16/4 (100/40) 91 (94/80) Selected 
   2.2.1.2 Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for ESA refractoriness 13/2 (93/22) 62 (64/30) — — Dropped after first round 
   2.2.1.3 Overtreatment with growth factors 13/3 (93/30) 67 (67/67) — — Dropped after first round 
   2.2.1.4 LEN in MDS del(5q) 13/2 (93/22) 91 (90/100) 16/4 (100/30) 89 (91/80) Selected 
   2.2.1.5 LEN in non-del(5q) MDS 13/2 (93/22) 51 (49/70) — — Dropped after first round 
   2.2.1.6 Luspatercept in MDS with RS or mutated SF3B1 13/2 (93/11) 40 (40/40) — — Dropped after first round 
  2.2.2 Other cytopenias      
   2.2.2.1 Immunosuppressive treatment* 13/2 (93/22) 63 (64/50) 8/1 (50/10) 62 (68/20) Dropped after reevaluation 
   2.2.2.2 Thrombopoietin-stimulating agents 12/2 (86/22) 60 (59/40) — — Dropped after first round 
   2.2.2.3 HMAs in lower-risk MDS 13/2 (93/22) 51 (46/73) — — Dropped after first round 
 2.3 Higher-risk      
  2.3.1 Unfit: Noneligible for (or declined) intensive treatment and/or allo-HSCT      
   2.3.1.1 HMAs in higher-risk MDS 14/3 (100/30) 92 (97/67) 16/3 (100/30) 83 (85/73) Selected 
  2.3.2 Fit: Eligible for intensive treatment and/or allo-HSCT      
   2.3.2.1 Induction with chemotherapy or HMA before allo-HSCT 14/2 (100/22) 66 (61/100) 16/3 (100/30) 77 (79/67) Selected 
   2.3.2.2 Postinduction chemotherapy for patients without a suitable donor 13/2 (93/22) 58 (54/80) — — Dropped after first round 
   2.3.2.3 Postinduction chemotherapy for patients with a complicated induction course 13/2 (93/22) 49 (44/80) — — Dropped after first round 
   2.3.2.4 Upfront allo-HSCT 13/2 (93/22) 68 (62/90) 16/3 (100/30) 79 (84/53) Selected 
   2.3.2.5 Allo-HSCT 13/2 (93/22) 79 (75/100) 15/3 (94/30) 89 (93/67) Selected 
Provider/infrastructural characteristics, n = 17      
 3.1 Certification and accreditation      
  3.1.1 Institutions certified in hemato-oncology 11/5 (79/56) 64 (58/100) — — Dropped after first round 
  3.1.2 Access to a certified/accredited diagnostics laboratory 13/6 (93/67) 78 (76/83) 15/6 (94/60) 76 (69/93) Dropped after second round 
 3.2 Personnel      
  3.2.1 Board-certified and appropriately trained physicians 13/3 (93/33) 79 (80/80) 15/5 (94/50) 83 (84/80) Dropped after second round 
  3.2.2 Nursing expertise 12/8 (86/89) 73 (77/68) 15/8 (94/80) 78 (77/80) Dropped after second round 
  3.2.3 Multidisciplinary care team 12/9 (86/100) 70 (72/69) 15/9 (94/90) 89 (92/84) Selected 
 3.3 Organization      
  3.3.1 Safe handling of cytotoxic drugs 12/7 (86/78) 67 (68/66) 15/7 (94/70) 85 (79/97) Selected 
  3.3.2 Isolation ward 13/8 (94/89) 75 (70/85) 15/7 (94/70) 78 (75/86) Dropped after second round 
  3.3.3 Interdisciplinary diagnostic review 13/6 (94/67) 79 (86/63) 15/7 (94/70) 87 (84/94) Selected 
  3.3.4 Interdisciplinary treatment board 12/5 (86/56) 79 (75/88) 15/7 (94/70) 87 (85/91) Selected 
  3.3.5 Multidisciplinary care board 10/8 (71/89) 77 (85/80) 15/7 (94/70) 80 (72/97) Dropped after second round 
  3.3.6 Teaching and continuing education 12/8 (86/89) 68 (68/68) 15/7 (94/70) 85 (83/91) Selected 
  3.3.7 Emergency services for hemato-oncological diseases 13/8 (93/89) 86 (83/93) 15/7 (94/70) 88 (87/91) Selected 
  3.3.8 Standard operating procedures 12/5 (86/56) 75 (75/80) 15/8 (94/80) 79 (75/88) Dropped after second round 
 3.4 Cooperation      
  3.4.1 Multi-institutional care network 11/7 (79/78) 62 (60/63) — — Dropped after first round 
  3.4.2 Prospective clinical registries 12/5 (84/56) 66 (69/56) 15/6 (94/60) 84 (84/79) Dropped after second round 
  3.4.3 Biobanking 13/4 (93/44) 78 (71/80) 15/5 (94/50) 82 (81/84) Dropped after second round 
  3.4.4 Access to clinical trials 12/7 (86/78) 83 (83/80) 15/8 (94/80) 92 (95/88) Selected 
Domains, subdomains and GBIsFeedback first round, (%/%)Performance first round, % (%/%)Feedback second round, (%/%)Performance second round, % (%/%)Final rating outcomes
Total 23: 14/9 (100/100)  26: 16/10 (100/100)   
Diagnosis, n = 23      
 1.1 Basic diagnostic workup      
  1.1.1 WHO 2016 classification 14/4 (100/44) 83 (84/80) 16/4 (100/40) 94 (93/100) Selected 
  1.1.2 Peripheral blood count and smear 14/4 (100/44) 86 (86/85) 16/4 (100/40) 89 (89/85) Selected 
  1.1.3 Bone marrow cytology 14/4 (100/44) 84 (86/80) 16/4 (100/40) 95 (95/95) Selected 
  1.1.4 Iron staining 14/4 (100/44) 78 (76/85) 16/4 (100/40) 96 (96/95) Selected 
  1.1.5 Bone marrow histology including immunohistochemistry 13/4 (93/44) 79 (78/80) 16/4 (100/40) 85 (83/95) Selected 
  1.1.6 Cytogenetic analysis 13/4 (93/44) 88 (87/70) 16/4 (100/40) 95 (95/95) Selected 
 1.2 Supplementary diagnostic workup      
  1.2.1 Cytochemistry 13/2 (93/22) 44 (44/50) — — Dropped after first round 
  1.2.2 Immunophenotyping 13/2 (93/22) 52 (52/60) — — Dropped after first round 
  1.2.3 Fluorescence in situ hybridization 13/2 (93/22) 62 (65/40) — — Dropped after first round 
  1.2.4 Microarray comparative genomic hybridization 13/1 (93/11) 41 (39/80) — — Dropped after first round 
  1.2.5 Molecular diagnostics/NGS 13/1 (93/11) 76 (75/100) 16/3 (100/30) 85 (84/93) Selected 
 1.3 Diagnostic workup related to treatment      
  1.3.1 Serum erythropoietin in patients with symptomatic anemia 13/3 (93/30) 90 (88/100) 16/4 (100/40) 93 (92/95) Selected 
  1.3.2 Monitoring iron status 13/3 (93/30) 92 (91/100) 16/4 (100/40) 87 (85/95) Selected 
  1.3.3 TP53 mutation status in MDS del(5q) 13/2 (93/22) 85 (85/100) 16/3 (100/30) 86 (88/80) Selected 
1.4 Risk stratification      
  1.4.1 Disease-based risk stratification      
   1.4.1.1 Disease-based risk stratification according to IPSS 13/2 (93/22) 79 (76/100) — — Merged with 1.4.1.2 
   1.4.1.2 Disease-based risk stratification according to IPSS/IPSS-R 13/2 (93/22) 93 (92/100) 16/3 (100/30) 98 (100/87) Selected 
   1.4.1.3 Disease-based risk stratification according to WPSS 13/2 (93/22) 64 (59/100) — — Dropped after first round 
  1.4.2 Patient-based risk stratification      
   1.4.2.1 Patient-based risk stratification 13/2 (93/22) 74 (73/84) 16/4 (100/40) 72 (70/80) Selected 
   1.4.2.2 Assessment for germline predisposition for inherited hematological malignancy syndromes 13/2 (93/22) 56 (55/70) — — Dropped after first round 
1.5 Follow-up/outcomes      
  1.5.1 PROs* 13/6 (93/67) 62 (59/70) 9/6 (56/60) 73 (64/87) Selected after reevaluation 
  1.5.2 Response assessment 13/5 (93/56) 69 (65/76) 16/3 (100/30) 89 (93/73) Selected 
  1.5.3 Toxicity assessment 13/7 (93/78) 63 (64/57) 16/8 (100/80) 68 (60/85) Dropped after second round 
  1.5.4 Geriatric assessment* 12/5 (86/56) 51 (46/64) 5/4 (31/40) 62 (44/85) Dropped after reevaluation 
Therapy, n = 21      
 2.1 Supportive care      
  2.1.1 Overtreatment of lower-risk MDS patients with asymptomatic cytopenia 13/3 (93/30) 63 (63/67) 16/3 (100/30) 64 (65/60) Dropped after second round 
  2.1.2 Transfusions      
   2.1.2.1 Transfusions of red blood cell concentrates 13/3 (93/30) 73 (79/47) 16/4 (100/40) 84 (86/75) Selected 
   2.1.2.2 Iron chelation 13/3 (93/30) 69 (63/100) 16/3 (100/30) 64 (61/80) Dropped after second round 
   2.1.2.3 Transfusions of platelet concentrates 13/4 (93/44) 78 (77/80) 16/4 (100/50) 84 (84/84) Selected 
  2.1.3 Antibacterial prophylaxis 13/3 (93/30) 60 (59/81) — — Dropped after first round 
  2.1.4 Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for infections 13/2 (93/22) 54 (56/40) — — Dropped after first round 
 2.2 Lower-risk      
  2.2.1 Anemia      
   2.2.1.1 ESAs 13/3 (93/30) 89 (88/100) 16/4 (100/40) 91 (94/80) Selected 
   2.2.1.2 Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for ESA refractoriness 13/2 (93/22) 62 (64/30) — — Dropped after first round 
   2.2.1.3 Overtreatment with growth factors 13/3 (93/30) 67 (67/67) — — Dropped after first round 
   2.2.1.4 LEN in MDS del(5q) 13/2 (93/22) 91 (90/100) 16/4 (100/30) 89 (91/80) Selected 
   2.2.1.5 LEN in non-del(5q) MDS 13/2 (93/22) 51 (49/70) — — Dropped after first round 
   2.2.1.6 Luspatercept in MDS with RS or mutated SF3B1 13/2 (93/11) 40 (40/40) — — Dropped after first round 
  2.2.2 Other cytopenias      
   2.2.2.1 Immunosuppressive treatment* 13/2 (93/22) 63 (64/50) 8/1 (50/10) 62 (68/20) Dropped after reevaluation 
   2.2.2.2 Thrombopoietin-stimulating agents 12/2 (86/22) 60 (59/40) — — Dropped after first round 
   2.2.2.3 HMAs in lower-risk MDS 13/2 (93/22) 51 (46/73) — — Dropped after first round 
 2.3 Higher-risk      
  2.3.1 Unfit: Noneligible for (or declined) intensive treatment and/or allo-HSCT      
   2.3.1.1 HMAs in higher-risk MDS 14/3 (100/30) 92 (97/67) 16/3 (100/30) 83 (85/73) Selected 
  2.3.2 Fit: Eligible for intensive treatment and/or allo-HSCT      
   2.3.2.1 Induction with chemotherapy or HMA before allo-HSCT 14/2 (100/22) 66 (61/100) 16/3 (100/30) 77 (79/67) Selected 
   2.3.2.2 Postinduction chemotherapy for patients without a suitable donor 13/2 (93/22) 58 (54/80) — — Dropped after first round 
   2.3.2.3 Postinduction chemotherapy for patients with a complicated induction course 13/2 (93/22) 49 (44/80) — — Dropped after first round 
   2.3.2.4 Upfront allo-HSCT 13/2 (93/22) 68 (62/90) 16/3 (100/30) 79 (84/53) Selected 
   2.3.2.5 Allo-HSCT 13/2 (93/22) 79 (75/100) 15/3 (94/30) 89 (93/67) Selected 
Provider/infrastructural characteristics, n = 17      
 3.1 Certification and accreditation      
  3.1.1 Institutions certified in hemato-oncology 11/5 (79/56) 64 (58/100) — — Dropped after first round 
  3.1.2 Access to a certified/accredited diagnostics laboratory 13/6 (93/67) 78 (76/83) 15/6 (94/60) 76 (69/93) Dropped after second round 
 3.2 Personnel      
  3.2.1 Board-certified and appropriately trained physicians 13/3 (93/33) 79 (80/80) 15/5 (94/50) 83 (84/80) Dropped after second round 
  3.2.2 Nursing expertise 12/8 (86/89) 73 (77/68) 15/8 (94/80) 78 (77/80) Dropped after second round 
  3.2.3 Multidisciplinary care team 12/9 (86/100) 70 (72/69) 15/9 (94/90) 89 (92/84) Selected 
 3.3 Organization      
  3.3.1 Safe handling of cytotoxic drugs 12/7 (86/78) 67 (68/66) 15/7 (94/70) 85 (79/97) Selected 
  3.3.2 Isolation ward 13/8 (94/89) 75 (70/85) 15/7 (94/70) 78 (75/86) Dropped after second round 
  3.3.3 Interdisciplinary diagnostic review 13/6 (94/67) 79 (86/63) 15/7 (94/70) 87 (84/94) Selected 
  3.3.4 Interdisciplinary treatment board 12/5 (86/56) 79 (75/88) 15/7 (94/70) 87 (85/91) Selected 
  3.3.5 Multidisciplinary care board 10/8 (71/89) 77 (85/80) 15/7 (94/70) 80 (72/97) Dropped after second round 
  3.3.6 Teaching and continuing education 12/8 (86/89) 68 (68/68) 15/7 (94/70) 85 (83/91) Selected 
  3.3.7 Emergency services for hemato-oncological diseases 13/8 (93/89) 86 (83/93) 15/7 (94/70) 88 (87/91) Selected 
  3.3.8 Standard operating procedures 12/5 (86/56) 75 (75/80) 15/8 (94/80) 79 (75/88) Dropped after second round 
 3.4 Cooperation      
  3.4.1 Multi-institutional care network 11/7 (79/78) 62 (60/63) — — Dropped after first round 
  3.4.2 Prospective clinical registries 12/5 (84/56) 66 (69/56) 15/6 (94/60) 84 (84/79) Dropped after second round 
  3.4.3 Biobanking 13/4 (93/44) 78 (71/80) 15/5 (94/50) 82 (81/84) Dropped after second round 
  3.4.4 Access to clinical trials 12/7 (86/78) 83 (83/80) 15/8 (94/80) 92 (95/88) Selected 

GBIs in italics were dropped during the first or second rating rounds. Rating feedback are shown with absolute numbers and fractions for MDS and non-MDS experts separately, where 100% corresponds to the total number of participants within each category. Performance is shown as agreement scores for overall, as well as MDS and non-MDS experts separately.

—, not applicable (as no second rating was performed); RS, ringed sideroblasts; WHO, World Health Organization; WPSS, WHO Classification-based Prognostic Scoring System.

*

GBIs that were rechallenged in the second round.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal